View All Issues
Effect of oral anesthetization on the speech characteristics of persons with and without stuttering | Journal of All India Institute of Speech and Hearing

ISSN


ISSN

Vol 33 No 1 (2014)
Speech

Effect of oral anesthetization on the speech characteristics of persons with and without stuttering

How to Cite
YV, G., M, S., H, S., V, S., & M, I. (1). Effect of oral anesthetization on the speech characteristics of persons with and without stuttering. Journal of All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, 33(1), 33-38. Retrieved from http://203.129.241.91/jaiish/index.php/aiish/article/view/777

Abstract

Appropriate sensory feedback from the speech structures aects articula- tion and prosody. The study aimed to investigate the eects of oral anes- thetization on the speech characteristics in persons with stuttering (PWS) compared to normals. The participants included 18-30 year old 25 PWS and 25 age and gender matched controls. Their spontaneous speech and reading samples were video recorded prior to and after the administration of oral anesthesia. These samples were analyzed for Stuttering Like Dis-
uencies (SLDs), Normal Dis uencies (NDs), Articulation Errors (AE) and rate of speech. The SLDs and NDs were signicantly reduced un- der oral anesthesia and AEs were more of distortions and not signicant. The rates were signicantly reduced in both the groups under oral anes- thesia. The reduction in sensory input thus showed an in uence on the
speech behaviors and rate of speech signifying the need of appropriate sen- sory feedback from the articulators for uent speech which needs further exploration.

References

Adams, M.R., Moore, W.H., & Hutchinson, J.M. (1972).
The e ect of auditory masking on the anxiety and voice
loudness and the frequency of dys
uency of adult stut-
terers. Paper presented at the annual convention of the
American Speech and Hearing Association, San Fran-
cisco, California.
Archibald, L & De Nil, L.F. (1999). The relationship be-
tween stuttering severity and kinesthetic acuity for jaw
movements in adults who stutter. Journal of Fluency
Disorders, 24, 25-42.
Garber, S.R., & Siegel, G.M. (1982). Feedback and motor
control in stuttering. In D.K. Routh (Ed.), Learning,
speech and the complex e ects of punishment. Boston:
Plenum Publishing Corporation.
Gracco,V. L. (1987). A multilevel control model for speech
motor activity. In H. Peters & W. HuIstijn (Eds.),
Speech motor dynamics in stuttering (pp. 57-76). Wien:
Springer-Verlag.
Gracco, V. L. (1991). Sensorimotor mechanisms in speech
motor control. In H.F.M. Peters, W. Hulstijn, & C.W.
Starkweather (Eds.), Speech motor control and stutter-
ing. New York: Elsevier.
Gracco, V. L., & Abbs, J. H. (1989). Sensorimotor charac-
teristics of speech motor sequences. Experimental Brain
Research, 75, 586-598.
Hutchinson, J. M., & Ringel, R. L. (1975). The e ect of oral
sensory deprivation on stuttering behavior, Journal of
Communication Disorders, 8, 249-258.
Leanderson, R. (1972). On the functional organization of
facial muscles in speech. Stockholm, Sweden: Depart-
ments of Otolaryngology and Clinical Neurophysiology,
Karolinska Sjukhuset.
Leanderson, R., & Persson, A. (1972). The e ect of trigemi-
nal nerve block on the articulatory EMG activity of facial
muscles. Acta Otolaryngologica, 74, 271-278.
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., &
Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech
code. Psychological Revision, 74, 431-463.
Loucks, T. M. J., & De Nil, L. F. (2006). Oral kinesthetic
de cit in adults who stutter: A target accuracy study.
Journal of Motor Behaviour, 38(3), 238-246.
Mysak, E. D. (1959). A servo model for speech ther-
apy. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 24, 144-
149.
Neilson, M. D., & Neilson, P. D. (1991). Adaptive model the-
ory of speech motor control and stuttering. In H.F.M.
Peters . W. Hulstign & C.W. Starkweather (Eds.),
Speech motor control and stuttering New York: Else-
vier.
Putnam, A. H. B. (1973). Articulation with reduced sensory
control: A cine-radiographic study. Ph.D. dissertation,
Purdue University.
Riley, G. (1994). Stuttering Severity Instrument for Chil-
dren and Adults (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Ringel, R.L., & Steer, M. (1963). Some e ects of tactile
and auditory alterations on speech output. Journal of
Speech and Hearing Research, 6, 369-378.
Scott, C. M., & Ringel, R. L. (1971). Articulation without
oral sensory control. Journal of Speech Hearing Re-
search, 14, 804-818.
Shane, M.L. (1955). E ect on stuttering of alternation in
auditory feedback. In W. Johnson and R. Leuteneg-ger
(Eds.), Stuttering in children and adults. Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press,
Smith, A., & Kelly, E. (1997). Stuttering: A dynamic, multi-
factorial model. In R. Curlee and G. Siegel (eds). Nature
and treatment of stuttering: New directions (pp.204-
217). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Smith, A., Sadagopan, N., Walsh, B., & Weber-Fox, C.
(2010). Phonological Complexity A ects Speech Motor
Dynamics in Adults Who Stutter. Journal of Fluency
Disorders, 35, 1-18.
Starkweather, C. W. (1981). Speech
uency and its devel-
opment in normal children. In Speech and Language:
Advances in Basic Research and Practice (vol. 4) New
York: Academic Press.
Svirsky, M. A., Lane, H., Perkell, J. S, & Wozniak, J. (1992).
E ects of short-term auditory deprivation on speech pro-
duction in adult cochlear implant users. Journal of
Acoustical Society of America, 92, 1284-1300.
Tremblay, S., Shiller, D.M., & Ostry, D.J. (2003). So-
matosensory basis of speech production. Nature, 423,
866-869.
Uthappa, A. G. V., Shailat, P., & Geetha, Y. V. (2010). Ef-
fect of oral anesthetization on
uency. Paper presented
at the 42nd India Speech and Hearing Association con-
ference.
van Lieshout, P. H. H. M., Hulstijn, W., & Peters, H. F.
M. (1996). Speech production in persons who stutter:
Testing the motor plan assembly hypothesis. Journal of
Speech Hearing Research, 39, 76-92.