View All Issues
An evaluative study of vocal hygiene awareness program in professional voice users (Prospective Teachers) | Journal of All India Institute of Speech and Hearing

ISSN


ISSN

Vol 30 No 1 (2011)
Speech

An evaluative study of vocal hygiene awareness program in professional voice users (Prospective Teachers)

Published May 6, 2011
How to Cite
R, R., K, P., K, Y., & YV, G. (2011). An evaluative study of vocal hygiene awareness program in professional voice users (Prospective Teachers). Journal of All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, 30(1), 9-14. Retrieved from http://203.129.241.91/jaiish/index.php/aiish/article/view/939

Abstract

Vocal hygiene education program addresses the importance of proper care of vocal fold tissue suggesting certain changes in behaviors, patterns, life style and diet. It is an effective method to create awareness, reduce vocal abuse and prevent onset and progression of voice problems among the teachers and other professional voice users. The effectiveness of such sensitization programs has not been documented in the Indian context. The present study aimed to evaluate the short-term effect of a vocal hygiene awareness program among the teacher training students in Mysore city. The program consisted of three consecutive sessions on anatomy of voice production, causes of voice disorders and vocal hygiene tips to teachers, delivered audio-visually by experienced speech language pathologists. A basic questionnaire consisting of 10 questions (one open ended and nine close ended) was prepared, which was divided into three sections based on different areas of voice. The questionnaire was administered prior to and after the sensitization program. The efficacy was determined based on participant’s ability to answer the questions. The results showed that the average percent scores improved from 58% (pre-test) to 73% (post-test) after attending the program. Further studies that address other voice care domains in the questionnaire like vocal and non-vocal practices, diet, and classroom management and the long-term effect of such programs have to be addressed to understand the effectiveness of such programs. 

References

Boominathan, P., Chandrasekhar, D., Nagarajan, R.,
Madraswala, Z., & Rajan, A. (2008). Vocal
hygiene awareness programme for professional voice
users (teachers): An evaluative study from
Chennai. Asia Pacific Journal of Speech,
Language and Hearing, 11 (1), 39-45.
Boominathan, P., Chandrasekhar, D., Ravi, S., &
Krupa M (2009). Impact of 'Vocal Hygiene
Awareness Programme' in Professional Voice
Users (Teachers). Journal of Indian Speech and
Hearing Association, 23, 10-18.
Boominathan, P., Rajendran, A., Nagarajan, R.,
Seethapathy, J., & Gnanasekar, M. (2008). Vocal
abuse and vocal hygiene practices among
different level professional voice users in India: A
survey. Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language
and Hearing, 11 (1), 47-53.
Boone, D.R. (1983). The Voice & Voice Therapy (3rd
ed.). New York: Prentice Hall, INC, Englewood
Cliffs.
Bistritsky, Y., & Frank, Y. (1981) In Mattiske, J. A.,
Oates., & K. M. Greenwood (1998). Vocal
problems among teachers: A review of
prevalence, causes, prevention and treatment.
Journal of Voice, 12 (4), 489-499.
Calas, M. (1989). In J. A. Mattiske; J.M. Oates, & K.
M. Greenwood (1998). Vocal problems among
teachers: A review of prevalence, causes,
prevention and treatment. Journal of Voice, 12
(4), 489-499.
Chan, R.W. (1994). Does the voice improve with
vocal hygiene education? A study of some
instrumental voice measures in a group of
kindergarten teachers. Journal of Voice, 8, 279-
291.
Duffy, O. M., & Hazlett, D. E. (2004). The Impact of
Preventive Voice Care Programs for Training
Teachers: A Longitudinal Study, Journal of
Voice, 18(1), 63–70.
Fritzell, B. (1996). Voice disorders and occupations.
Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 21, 7–11.
Kaufman, T.J., & Johnson, T.S. (1991). An exemplary
preventative voice program for educators.
Seminars in Speech and Language, 12, 40–48.
Morton, V. & Watson, D.R. (2001a). Voice in the
classroom. A re-evaluation. In P.H. Dejonckere
(Ed.), Occupational voice: Care and cure (pp.
53–69). Hague: Kugel Publications.
Rantala, L., Paavola, L., Körkkö, P., & Vilkman, E.
(1998). Working-day effects on the spectral
characteristics of teaching voice. Folia
Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 50, 205– 211.
Roy, N., Merrill, R.M., Thibeault, S., Gray, S.D., &
Smith, E.M. (2004). Voice disorders in teachers
and the general population: effects on work
performance, attendance, and future career
choices. Journal of Speech, Language, and
Hearing Research, 47, 542-551.
Smith, E., Gray, S.D., Dove, H., Kirchner, L., & Heras
H. (1997). Frequency and effects of teachers’
voice problems. Journal of Voice, 11, 81–87.
Smith, E., Kirchner, H.L., Taylor, M., Hoffman, H., &
Lemke J.H. (1998). Voice problems among
teachers: Differences by gender and teaching
characteristics. Journal of Voice, 12, 328–334
Verdolini, K., & Ramig, L.O. (2001). Review:
Occupational risks for voice problems.
Logopedics, Phoniatrics, Vocology, 26, 37–46.
Yiu, E.M. (2002). Impact and prevention of voice
problems in the teaching profession: Embracing
the consumers’ view. Journal of Voice, 16, 215–
228.