View All Issues
Acoustic correlates of emphatic stress in Malayalam | Journal of All India Institute of Speech and Hearing

ISSN


ISSN

Vol 33 No 1 (2014)
Speech

Acoustic correlates of emphatic stress in Malayalam

How to Cite
M, I., B, R., & N, S. (1). Acoustic correlates of emphatic stress in Malayalam. Journal of All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, 33(1), 59-62. Retrieved from http://203.129.241.91/jaiish/index.php/aiish/article/view/781

Abstract

Stress is a perceived prominent function at syllable, word, or sentence level.Emphatic stress is to convey dierent intents by emphasizing  dierent words in sentences; without changing the meaning. The acoustic correlates ofemphatic stress include increased fundamental frequency,  amplitude, and durationvaryingaccording the structure of languages.
As there are no reports on acoustic correlates of emphatic stress in Malayalam language, the present study was aimed to investigate the same in Malayalam. A total of 20 native adult speakers of Malayalam with equal number of males and females were selected for the study. The stimuli included 10two word phrases with adjective and verbs/
nouns. The subjects were asked to readthe phrases with and without  stress on the adjectives marked in red colour. Recorded stimuli subjected to acoustic analysisto extract the fundamental frequency (f0), intensity (dB) and duration (msec) parameters from the adjective part of each of the phrases using Praat(Version 5.3.17) software. Statistical analysis
revealed signicant increase in word duration in stressed conditions. 

References

Balasubramanian, T. (1981). Emphasis in Tamil, Journal of
Phonetics, 9, 139-150.
Bertinetto, S. (1980). Observations on Sentential Stress,
Language, 48, 304-328.
Ben-nett, D.C. (1968). Spectral form and duration as cues in
the recognition of English and German vowels, Language
and Speech, 11, 65-85.
Bolinger, D. (1958). Stress and information.American
speech, 33, 5-20.
Bolinger, D. (1972). Accent is predictable. Language, 48(3),
633-644.
Cruttenden, A. (1986). Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press
Gatenby, J. H. (1975). Stress and elastic syllable: an
acoustic method for delineating lexical stress patterns
in connected speech. http://arkitecturadellenguaje.
les.wordpress.com/2013/11/action-to-language-via-
the-mirror-neuron-system.pdf.
Hargrove, P. M., & McGarr, N. S. (1994). Prosody man-
agement of communication disorders. San Diego, CA:
Singular Publishing.
Jassem, W. J., Morton, J., & Ste en- Batog, M. (1968).The
perception of stress in synthetic speech like stimuli by
polish listeners. Speech analysis and synthesis, 1, 289
- 308.
Kumar, R. B. & Bhat J. S. (2009). Acoustic correlates of
stress in Konkani language, Language in India, 9, 329-
335.
Lehiste, I. (1968). Vowel quality in word and utterances
in Estonian, International congress of nno-ugristarum,
SocietasFinno-Ugrica, 293-303.
Lehiste, I. (1970). Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT
Press
Morton, J. & Jassem, W. (1965). Acoustic correlates of
stress. Language and Speech, 8, 159-181.
Narasimhan, S. V., Jose, L. R., Hasain, B. S. & Chand, R.
(2010). Acoustic Correlates of Stress in Mizo, a Tonal
Language.Language in India,10 (4), 224-235.
Narra, M., Teja, D. D., Sneha, M. V. & Dattatreya, T.
(2012). Acoustic Correlates of Emphatic Stress in Tulu:
A Preliminary Study. American Journal of Linguistics,
1 (3), 28-32.
Rajupratap, S. (1991). Production of word stress in children
- 3 - 4 years. In M. Jayaram & S.R.Savithri (Eds). Re-
search at AIISH.Dissertation. Abstracts-3, 11.
Rigault, A. (1962). Suprasegmentals, In Lehiste, I, the
M.I.T Press, Cambridge, 120- 125.
Ruchi, A., Ghosh, K., & Savithri, S. R. (2007). Acoustic
correlates of stress in Hindi, Proceedings of international
symposium: Frontiers of research on speech and music,
281-283.
Sasidharan, N. (1995). Vowel duration in Malayalam
language. Unpublished dissertation, University of
Mysore.
Savithri, S.R. (1987). Some acoustic and perceptual corre-
lates of stress in Kannada. Proceedings of the National
Symposium on Acoustics, Special edition, 209.
Savithri, S. R. (1999a). Perception of word stress. Pro-
ceedings of the Madras India Regional Conference of the
Acoustical Society of America, 2, 110 -113.
Savithri, S. R. (1999b). Perceptual cues of word stress in
Kannada. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of In-
dia, 25, 1-4.
Sitapati, G. V. (1936). Accent in Telugu speech and verse,
Indian Linguistics, 6, 201-245.
Sreedevi, N. (2000). Acoustic characteristics of vow-
els in Kannada. Unpublished thesis, University of
Mysore.
Srinivas, C. (1992). Word stress in Telugu and English. Un-
published Dissertation submitted to C.I.E.F.L.
Westin, K., Buddenhagen, R. G., & Obrecht, D. H.
(1966).An experimental analysis of relative importance
of pitch quantity and intensity as cues to phonemic dis-
tinctions in southern Swedish, Language and Speech, 9,
114-126.