View All Issues
Assessment of Voice Quality in Monozygotic Twins: Qualitative and Quantitative Measures | Journal of All India Institute of Speech and Hearing

ISSN


ISSN

Vol 28 No 1 (2009): .
Speech

Assessment of Voice Quality in Monozygotic Twins: Qualitative and Quantitative Measures

Keywords
  • CAPE-V,
  • DSI,
  • Correlation
How to Cite
Jayakumar T., & Savithri S.R. (1). Assessment of Voice Quality in Monozygotic Twins: Qualitative and Quantitative Measures. Journal of All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, 28(1), 8-13. Retrieved from http://203.129.241.91/jaiish/index.php/aiish/article/view/361

Abstract

Voice quality is the multidimensional vocal attribute, covering both laryngeal and supra laryngeal aspect. It is generally accepted that the physical characteristics of the laryngeal mechanism and vocal mechanism are genetically determined. It may be hypothesized that monozygotic (MZ) twins voice quality sound similar to certain degree. To measure the voice quality qualitative and the quantitative assessments can be used. The present study investigated MZ twins voice quality using Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) as qualitative and Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI) as a quantitative measure and compared both the voice quality measurements. Twenty pairs (6 M pair, 14 F pair) of MZ twins in the age range of 18 to 25 years were participated. Phonation of a, i, and u were recorded 3 times at comfortable pitch and loudness using Sony mini digital recorder. Five speech-language pathologists carried out qualitative assessment. CSL 4500 was used to measure the frequency and intensity parameters and jitter values. Correlation coefficient was significant (p< 0.01) for all the parameters except strain, loudness, low-Intensity and jitter, and paired‘t’ test showed no significant difference between twins for any of the parameters. Gender difference was significant for maximum phonation time and high fundamental frequency. This difference was attributed to anatomy and physiological variation among gender. High negative Correlation coefficient (r = - 0.78) was found between qualitative and quantitative measurements.DSI also showed good coefficient value with roughness and breathiness of CAPE-V. In conclusion, voice quality of monozygotic twins was similar in many of the parameters of qualitative and quantitative measures. Further investigation with a large scale of sample and confirmed genetic analysis is warranted.

References

  1. ASHA. (2002). http://www.asha.org/about/ mem bershipcertification/ divs/div_3.htm
  2. De Bodt, M. S., Wuyts, F. L., Van de Heyning, P. H., Croux , C. (1997). Test-retest study of the GRBAS scale: influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality. Journal of Voice, 11, 74–80.
  3. Debruyne, F., Decoster, W., Van Gysel, A., & Vercammen, J. (2002). Speaking fundamental frequency in monozygotic and dizygotic twins. Journal of Voice, 16, 466-471.
  4. Decoster, W. A., Van Gysel, A., Vercammen, J., & Debruyne, F. (2001). Voice similarity in identical twins. Acta Oto Rhino laryngological belg, 55, 49-55.
  5. Dejonckere, P. H., Remacle, M., Fresnel-Elbaz, E., Woisard, V., Crevier-Buchman, L., Millet, B. (1996). Differentiated perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord), 117(3), 219-24.
  6. Forrai, G., & Gordos, G. (1983). A new acoustic method for the discrimination of monozygotic and dizygotic twins. Acta paediatrica Hungarica, 24, 315-321.
  7. Gedda, L., Fiori, R., & Bruno, G. (1960). Viox chez les jumeaux monozygotiques. Folia phoniatrica, 12, 81-94
  8. Hakkesteegt, M. M., Brocaar, M. P.,Wieringa, M. H., Feenstra, L. (2008). The relationship between perceptual evaluation and objective multiparametric evaluation of dysphonia severity. Journal of Voice, 22, 138–145.
  9. Heman-Ackah,Y. D., Michael, D. D., Goding, G. S., (2002). The relationship between cepstral peak prominence and selected parameters of dysphonia. Journal of Voice, 16, 20–27.
  10. Heman-Ackah, Y. D., Heuer, R. J., Michael, D. D., et al. (2003). Cepstral peak prominence: a more reliable measure of dysphonia. Ann Otology Rhinology & Laryngology, 112, 324–333.
  11. Hirano, M. (1981). Clinical Examination of Voice. Wien; New York: Springer.
  12. Jayakumar, T & Savithri, S. R. (2008). Investigation into voice source of monozygotic twins using formant based inverse filtering. Journal of the All India Institute of Speech &Hearing, 27, 8-14.
  13. Kalaiselvi, P. S., Santhosh, M., & Savithri, S. R. (2005). Multi dimensional analysis of voice in monozygotic twins. Journal of the Acoustical Society of India, C, 25-28.
  14. Kreiman, J., Gerratt, B. R. ( 1998). Validity of rating scale measures of voice quality. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 104(3 Pt 1):1598–1608.
  15. Kreiman, J., Gerratt, B. R., Kempster, G. B., Erman, A., Berke, G. S. (1993). Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: review, tutorial, and a framework for future research. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 21–40.
  16. Piccirillo, J. F., Painter, C., Fuller, D., Haiduk, A.,Fredrickson, J. M. ( 1998a). Assessment of two objective voice function indices. Ann Otology Rhinology & Laryngology,107, 396-400.
  17. Piccirillo, J. F., Painter, C., Fuller, D., Fredrickson, J. M. (1998). Multivariate analysis of objective vocal function. Ann Otology Rhinology & Laryngology, 107, 107-112.
  18. Przbyla, B., Horii, T., & Crawford, M. (1992). Vocal fundamental frequency in a twin sample: looking for a genetic effect. Journal of Voice, 6, 261-266.
  19. Sataloff, R. (1997). Professinal Voice, the Science and Art of Cliniccal Care. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego: CA.
  20. Santosh, M., & Savithri, S. R. (2005). Voice prints in monozygotic twins. Journal of the Acoustical Society of India, C, 1-7.
  21. Van Lierde, K. M., Vinck, B., De Ley, S., Clement, G., & Van Cauwenberge, P. (2005). Genetics of vocal quality characteristics in monozygotic twins: a multiparameter approach. Journal of Voice, 19, 511-518.
  22. Wuyts, F. L., De Bodt, M. S., Molenberghs, G., et al. (2000). The Dysphonia Severity Index: an objective measure of vocal quality based on a multiparameter approach. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 43, 796-809.
  23. Yu, P., Ouaknine, M., Revis, J., Giovanni, A. (2001). Objective voice analysis for dysphonic patients: a multiparametric protocol including acoustic and aerodynamic measurements. Journal of Voice, 15, 529-542.