Copyright (c) 2007 All India Insitute of Speech and Hearing, Mysore
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Honikman (1964) defined base-of-articulation of a language as an articulatory setting that reflects the settings of the most frequently occurring segments and segmental combinations in the language. The present study investigated the nature of cross-language differences in base-of-articulation in 13 Indian languages namely, Assamese, Bengali, Hindi, Kannada, Kashmiri, Kodava, Oriya, Rajasthani, Malayalam, Marathi, Tamil, Telugu, and Punjabi that have phonemically unequal vowel inventories. Five males and five
females speaking each language participated in the study. Non-sense V1CV2 syllables were recorded from ten normal native speakers in each of the 13 languages. Frequencies of the first and second formants were measured using CSL 4500. The five common vowels existing in all languages were compared for base-ofarticulation. Difference. Results indicated significant difference between languages, vowels, and gender. In brief, F1 was high in Oriya and Marathi, and was low in Bengali, Punjabi and Kannada; others were in between. Prominently base-of-articulation (position of tongue, F2) is fronted in Bengali, is back in Kashmiri and other Indian languages are in between. The results of the present study have augmented the knowledge about cross-language differences in base-of-articulation in Indian languages. Also, the results help in rehabilitation process.
References
Bradlow, A. R. (1995), A Comparative acoustic study of English and Spanish vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97:1916-1924.
Chiba, T. & Kajiyama, M. (1941). The vowel its nature and structure. Tokyo, Kaiseikan publishing company limited.
Collins, B. & Mees, I.M. (1995), Approaches to articulatory setting in foreign-language teaching. In Lewis (Ed.). Studies in general and English phonetics: Essay in honors of professor J. D. O'Conner, 415- 424. London: Routledge.
Disner, S.F (1978). Vowels in Germanic languages. Working papers in phonetics, 40. UCLA phonetics laboratory, Los Angeles.
Disner, S. (1983) Vowel quality: The relation between universal and language specific factors, UCLA working papers in phonetics, 58, Chapter - V, 115-130.
Eguchi, S. & Hirsh, I.J. (1969). Development of speech sounds in children. Acta-Otolaryngologist, Supplement, 257, 5-51.
Fant, G. (1960). The acoustic theory of speech production. Mouton: The Hague.
Fant, G. (1973). Speech sounds and features. Cambridge: MIT press.
Fitch, W.T. & Giedd, J. (1999). Morphology and development of the human vocal tract: A study using magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 106, 1511 - 1522.
Ganesan, M., Aggarwal, S.S., Ansari, A..M. & Pavate, K.D. (1985). Recognition of speakers based on acoustic parameters of vowel sounds. Journal of the Acoustic society of India, 13, 202-212.
Gick, B., Wilson, I., Koch, K. & Cook, C. (2004). Language - specific articulatory settings: Evidence from inter-utterance rest position, Phonetica, 61 (4), 220-233.
Heffner, R.M.S. (1950), General Phonetics, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Hisagi, M., Nishi, K., & Strange, W. (2003). Acoustic properties of Japanese vowels: effect of speaking style and consonantal context. Paper presented at the 13th Japanese/ Korean linguistic conference, Michigan state University, Michigan
Honikman, B. (1964). Articulatory settings. In D. Abercrombie (Ed.). In Honour of Daniel Jones, 73 - 84, London: Longmans.
Liu, H.H., Tsao, F.H., & Kuhl, P.K. (2005). The effect of reduced vowel working space on speech intelligibility in Mandarin-speaking young adults with cerebral palsy. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117 (6), 3879-3889.
Kemp (1972) John Wallis: Grammar of the English language with an introductory treatise on speech. London: Longmans.
Ladefoged, P. (1975). A course in phonetics. New York: Harcourt Brace, Jovanovich, Inc.
Laver, J. (1978). The concept of articulatory settings: an historical survey. Historiographia Linguistica V: 1-14.
Lindau, M., & Wood, P., (1977). Acoustic vowel spaces, UCLA Working Paper in Phonetics, 38, 41-48.
Lindblom, B. (1989). Phonetic universals in vowel systems, In J.Ohala & J.Jaeger (Eds.) Experimental phonology, 13-44, New York: Academic press.
Majumdar, D.D., Datta, A.K., & Ganguli, N.R. (1978). Some studies on acoustic-phonetic feature of Telugu vowels. Acoustica, 41, 2, 55-64.
Pereson, G. E., & Barney, H.E. (1952). Control methods used in a study of vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 24, 175-184.
O'Connor J.D. (1973). Phonetics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Rajapurohit, B.B. (1982). Acoustic characteristics of Kannada. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages, Occasional Monograph Series.
Savithri, S.R. (1989). Acoustic and psychological correlates of speech. Journal of the Acoustical society of India, 17, (3, 4), 41-48.
Sreedevi, N. (2000). Acoustic characteristics of vowels in Kannada. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Mysore.
Stevens, K. (1972). The Quantal nature of speech: Evidence from articulatory-acoustic data. In E. David & P. Denes (Eds.). Human Communication: A Unified View, 51 - 66, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Stevens, K. (1989). On the Quantal nature of speech. Journal of Phonetics, 17, 3-16.
Sweet, H. (1890). A primer of phonetics. Oxford: Clarendon press.
Venkatesh, E.S. (1995). Acoustic analysis of Kannada speech sounds (vowels). Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Mysore.