Abstract
The present study investigated dierence in voice characteristics between Call Center Operators (CCOs) reporting symptoms of vocal attrition and no symptoms of vocal attrition using acoustic and auditory perceptual measures of voice evaluation. A self-reported questionnaire was used to identify the CCOs experiencing vocal attrition symptoms and no vocal at-
trition symptoms. The acoustic analysis of voice performed using MDVP (Multi-Dimensional Voice Program) using phonation sample of vowel /a/. Evaluation of perceptual voice quality was made using Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) scale. No signicant dierence in acoustic voice parameters observed between male CCOs
reporting vocal attrition symptoms and no vocal attrition symptoms, whereas, in female CCOs there was signicant dierence (p = 0.023) in NHR between two groups. However, when the acoustic parameters of CCOs (male & female) were compared with Indian normative values there were signicant dierences in some of the MDVP acoustic voice
parameters. Auditory perceptual rating scores between the two groups (with vocal symptoms and without) overlapped considerably such that, a substantial number of CCOs who did not report of any vocal symptoms and those who did were identied as having deviancy or normalcy in the perceptual vocal parameters respectively. Eventhough acoustic and
auditory perceptual measures of voice are found to be very useful in estab-lishing voice quality impairment, the agreement between these measures and self-perceived vocal symptoms remains inconsistent and they can-not quantify the amount of vocal dysfunction experienced by an individual.
References
ment of Speech and Voice (2nd ed.): Singular Publishing
Group.
Behrman, A., Sulica, L., & He, T. (2004). Factors predicting
patient perception of dysphonia caused by benign vocal
fold lesions. The Laryngoscope, 114, 1693-1700.
Casper, J. K. (2001). Treatment outcomes in occupational
voice disorders. In P. H. Dejonckere (Ed.), Occupational
Voice - Care and Cure (pp. 187 - 199). The Hague:
Kugler Publications.
Colton, R., & Casper, J. (1996).Understanding voice prob-
lems: A physiological perspective for diagnosis and treat-
ment. Baltimore: Wiliams & Wilkins.
deKrom, G. (1994). Consistency and reliability of voice
quality ratings for di erent types of speech fragments.
Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 985-
1000.
Schneider, B., & Bigenzahn, W. (2005). Vocal risk fac-
tors for occupational voice disorders in female teaching
students. European Archives of Otorhinolaryngology,
262(4), 272-276.
Devadas, U., & Rajashekhar, B. (2013). The prevalence and
impact of voice problems in call center operators. Jour-
nal of Laryngology and Voice, 3, 3-9.
Fex, S. (1992). Perceptual evaluation.Journal of Voice, 6,
155 - 158.
Haynes, W. O., & Pindzola, R. H. (1998).Diagnosis and
evaluation in speech pathology (5th ed.), Boston: MA:
Allyn and Bacon.
Hema, N., Sangeetha, M., & Pushpavathi, M. (2009).Nor-
mative data for Multi-Dimensional Voice Program
(MDVP) for adults - A computerized voice analysis sys-
tem.Journal of the All India Institute of Speech and
Hearing, 28, 1-7.
Higgins, M. B., & Saxman, J. (1989).Varitions in vocal fre-
quency perturbation across the menstrual cycle. Journal
of Voice, 3, 233-243.
Jones, K., Sigmon, J., Hock, L., & Nelson, E., Sullivan, M.,
& Ogren, F. (2002).Prevalence and risk factors for voice
problems among telemarketers. Archives of Otolaryn-
gology Head and Neck Surgery, 128, 571-577.
Kempster, G. B., Gerratt, B. R., Abbott, K. V., Barkmeier-
Kraemer, J., & Hillman, R. E. (2009). Consensus
Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice: Development
of a standardized clinical protocol American Journal of
Speech-Language Pathology, 18, 124 - 132.
Kent, R. D. (1994). The clinical science of motor speech dis-
orders: a personal assessment. In F. A. Till, K. Yorkston
& D. R. Beukelman (Eds.), Motors speech disorders: Ad-
vances in assessment and treatment, (pp. 3-18). Balti-
more: Paul Brooks.
Lehto, L., Laaksonen, L., Vilkman, E., Alku, P. (2006).
Occupational voice complaints and objective acoustic
measurement- do they correlate? Logopedics Phoniatrics
Vocology, 31, 147-152.
Lehto, L., Rantala, L., Vilkman, E., Alku, P., & Back-
strom, T. (2003). Experiences of a short vocal train-
ing course for call-centre customer service advisors.Folia
Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 55 , 163 - 176.
Ma, E. P. M., & Yiu, E. M. (2001). Voice activity and
participation pro le: Assessing the impact of voice dis-
orders on daily activities. Journal of Speech, Language
and Hearing Research, 44, 511-524.
Munoz, J., Mendoza, E., Fresneda, M. D., Carballo, G., &
Lopez, P. (2003).Acoustic and perceptual indicators of
normal and pathological voice.Folia Phoniatrica et Lo-
gopaedica, 55, 102-114.
Perkins, W. H. (1971). Vocal function: A behavioural anal-
ysis. In L. Travis (Ed.), Handbook of Speech Pathol-
ogy and Audiology. New York: Appleton Century
Croft.
Rantala, L., Vilkman, E., & Bloigu, R. (2002). Voice
changes during work: Subjective complaints and ob-
jective measurements for female primary and secondary
school teachers. Journal of Voice, 16, 344 - 355.
Revis, J., Giovanni, A., Wuyts, F. L., & Triglia, J. M.
(1999). Comparison of di erent voice samples for per-
ceptual analysis. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 51,
108-116.
Sapienza, C. M., & Woodson, G. E. (2009).Assessment of
vocal function. In J. B. Snow, P. A. Wackym& J. J.
Ballenger (Eds.), Ballenger's otorhinolaryngology: head
and neck surgery (17th ed.). London: People's Medical
Pub.
Satalo , R. T. (1991). Professional voice: The science and
art of clincal care. New York: Raven.
Shao, J., Mac Callum, J. K., Zhang, Y., Sprecher, A., &
Jiang, J. J. (2010). Acoustic analysis of the tremulous
voice: assessing the utility of the correlation dimesion
and perturbation parameters. Journal of Communica-
tion Disorders, 43, 35-44.
Taylor, P., & Oates, J. (2004).The prevalence and nature
of voice problems in call centre operators. Unpublished
Dissertation La Trobe University, Australia.
Titze, I. R. (1995).Workshop on Acoustic Voice Analysis:
Summary Statement. Denver CO: National Center for
Voice and Speech, 1-36.
Titze, I. R., Horii, Y., & Scherer, R. C. (1987).Some
technical consideration in voice perturbation measure-
ments. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30,
252-260.
Verdolini, K., & Ramig, L. O. (2001). Review: Occupa-
tional risks for voice problems. Logopedics Phoniatrics
Vocology, 26, 37-46.
Vilkman, E. (2004). Occupational safety and health aspects
of voice and speech professions. Folia Phoniatrica et
Logopaedica, 56, 220-253.
Vowels, M. (2004). Canadian call center workers get work re-
lated voice disorders (Publication. Retrieved 09.03.2005,
from Boston.com/News.)
Wolfe, V., Cornell, R., & Fitch, J. (1995).Sentence/Vowel
Correlation in the Evaluation of Dysphonia. Journal of
Voice, 9(3), 297-303.
Yiu, E. M. (2002). Impact and prevention of voice problems
in the teaching profession: Embracing the consumer's
view. Journal of Voice, 16, 215-228.