View All Issues
Voice Handicap Index – A Comparison of Clinician’s Ratings and Self Ratings by Individuals with Dysphonia | Journal of All India Institute of Speech and Hearing

ISSN


ISSN

Vol 28 No 1 (2009): .
Speech

Voice Handicap Index – A Comparison of Clinician’s Ratings and Self Ratings by Individuals with Dysphonia

Keywords
  • Voice Handicap Index,
  • Dysphonia
How to Cite
Medha Hegde, Achala C, & Sapna Bhat. (1). Voice Handicap Index – A Comparison of Clinician’s Ratings and Self Ratings by Individuals with Dysphonia. Journal of All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, 28(1), 25-30. Retrieved from http://203.129.241.91/jaiish/index.php/aiish/article/view/365

Abstract

Voice Handicap Index (VHI) is one of the measures of self perception of voice problem. It is a short self report questionnaire which is useful in routine clinical situations for assessing the progress of the disorder and the influence of interventions. Although various studies are done on self ratings by individuals with dysphonia (IWD) on VHI, there is a scarcity of studies on comparison of ratings by clinicians and self ratings by IWD. To compare the ratings between the VHI report of the IWD and that obtained by the clinician for the same patient. 13 IWD ranging in age from 18 to 57 years and 13 normal individuals matched on age and gender were chosen as the subjects. VHI was administered for both the groups and results were analyzed by the researcher. The SLP assessed the voice aspect in a separate assessment. VHI was also administered on the control group. Data was analyzed using Mann-Whitney ‘U’ test, Pearson’s correlation procedure and Wilecoxon Signed Ranks Test. The mean scores were higher in experimental group than those obtained by the control group in all the three sections of the VHI questionnaire. Mann Whitney U test showed high correlation between the scores obtained by the IWD and the clinician. There was no significant difference between the two groups on Wilecoxon Signed Ranks Test. Pearson’s correlation procedure showed that there is a high correlation between the VHI scores of the IWD and the scores of the clinician. These results suggest that clinicians are also reliable respondents in assessing the voice handicap in IWD. It may be concluded that the client’s perception of severity of voice disorder will enable the examiner to give treatment to IWD and to know the treatment efficacy by obtaining the clinician’s opinion on the VHI for individuals with voicedisorders.

References

Amir, O., Ashkenazi, O., Leiboritzh, T., Michael,O.,Avov, Y. & Wolff (2006). Applying the Voice Handicap Index to dysphonia and non
dysphonic Hebrew speakers. Journal of Voice, 20(2), 318-324.

Clark, R., Annies, Z., Jamie, O., Thomas, Z. & Thomas, M. (2004). Development and Validation of Voice Handicap Index -10. Laryngoscope, 114(9),
1549-1556.

Deary, I. J., Wilson, J. A., Carding, P. N. & Mackenzis, K. (2003). VOISS: a patient derive voice symptom sale. Journal of Psychosom Res, 54,
483-489.

Guimaraces. I. & Abberton, E. (2003). An investigation with speakers of Portuguese: Preliminary data. Journal of Voice, 18(1), 71-82

Jacobson B. H., Johnson, A., Grgnalski, C., Silbergleit, A.B. & Benninger,M.S. (1997). Development and Validation of Voice Handicap Index. American Journal of Speech- Language Pathology 6(3), 66-70.

Kuniyil, J. G. (2007). Development and validation of Voice handicap index in Malayalam. An unpublished master’s dissertation submitted to the University of Mangalore. 24 - 37.

Kandogan, T. & Sanal, A. (2005). Quality of life, functional outcome and Voice Handicap Index in partial laryngectomy patients for early glottic cancer.(Electronic version) Ear, Nose and Throat disorder, 5(3).

Murry, T., Medarado, R., Hogikyon N.D. & Aviv, J. E. (2004). The relationship between ratings of voice quality and quality of life measures. Journal of Voice, 18, 183-192.

Nawka, T., Wiesmann, U. & Gonnermann, U. (2003). Validation of The German version of the Voice Handicap Index (Electronic Version). Abteilung Phoniaric and Padaudiologic, 51(11), 921 - 931.

Olival, H. & Matias, C. (2005). Vocal impact on quality of life of elderly female subjects(electronic version). Revista Brasileria de Otorrinolaringologi, 71(2), 172 - 178.

Rosen, C., & Murry, T. (2000). Voice Handicap Index in Singers. Journal of Voice, 14(3), 370 - 377.

Rosen, C., Murry, T., Zinn, A., Zullo, T. & Sonbolian, M. (2000). Voice Handicap Index following treatment of voice disorders, Journal of Voice, 14 (4), 619-623.

Schuster, M., Lohscheller, J., Hoppe, U., Kummer,P., Eysholdt, U. & Rosanowski, F. (2004). Voice Handicap Index of laryngectomees with tracheoesophageal speech. Fol Phoniatrica Ettlogopaedica, 56, 62-67.

Sovani, P., Keer, V. & Sanghi, M. (2007). Correlation of Voice Handicap Index scores with client perceptions of severity in males v/s females with voice disorder. Paper presented in 39th ISHA Conference at Calicut, India, January.

Thomas, G., Dejong, Cova, R. J. C. & Kooijman, G.C. (2006). Prevalence of voice complaint, risk factor and impact of voice problem in female student teachers. Folia Phoniatrica Logopaedica, 58, 65-84.

Weigelt, S., Krischke, S., Klotz, M., Hoppe, U., Kollner, V., Eysholdt,U. & Rosanowski, F.(2004). Voice Handicap in patients with organic and functional
dysphonia (electronic version). Abteiung Phoniatric and Padaaudiologic, 52(8), 751-756.