- Specific language impairment,
- Pervasive developmental disorders,
- Semantics,
- Pragmatics,
- Syntax
Copyright (c) 2008 All India Insitute of Speech and Hearing, Mysore
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Pragmatic Language Impairment (PLI) is a developmental communication disorder, characterized by semantic and pragmatic deficits; relatively adequate phonology and syntax; and mild autistic features. The symptom profile overlaps with Pervasive Developmental Disorder (PDD) and Specific Language Impairment (SLI). The present paper attempts to highlight the differential diagnosis of PLI with common developmental language disorders as SLI and PDD. Two children with speech and language characteristics suggestive of PLI are discussed. Two children (5 yrs each) participated in the study with the complaint of inadequate speech and language skills. Speech and language skills of these two children were evaluated using formal and informal methods.
The responses were recorded and were further transcribed for analysis. The obtained profiles of the two children were compared across the profiles of developmental disorders as PLI, SLI and PDD. Case1 presented an early onset, delayed developmental milestones with poor pre-linguistic skills and significant semantic and pragmatic deficits. Case 2, in contrast, showed delayed speech milestones, relatively better pre-linguistic skills and near normal semantic and syntactic skills. Both the cases presented with clear, fluent speech without articulation errors. Pragmatic deficits were prominent in both the cases, with case1 having more severe difficulties. Both case1 and case2 had mildly impaired social skills.Differential diagnosis of PLI with other developmental language
disorders is controversial issue. PLI shares features of linguistic processing deficits with SLI on one hand, and deficits in pragmatics, social skills and stereotyped repetitive behaviors with PDD on the other hand. There are no well-defined boundaries amongst these disorders. Additionally, course of PLI is such that it changes the diagnostic category as the clinical picture varies with time. The two cases discussed in the present paper had pragmatic deficits in common, though of varied severity and associated features.
References
with semantic-pragmatic disorders I: Exchange structure, turn taking, repairs and
cohesion. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 24, 211-239.
Bishop, D. V. M. (1989). 'Autism, Asperger Syndrome and Semantic-Pragmatic
Disorder: Where Are the Boundaries?' British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 24, 107-121.
Bishop, D. V. M. (1998). Development of the Children's Communication Checklist
(CCC): A method of assessing qualitative aspects of communication impairment in
children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 879-891.
Bishop, D. V. M. (2000a). What's so special about Asperger's syndrome? The need for further exploration of the borderlands of autism. In A. Klin, F. R. Volkmar & S. S. Sparrow
(Eds.), Asperger Syndrome (pp. 254-277). New York: Guildford.
Bishop, D. V. M. (2000b). Pragmatic Language Impairment: A correlate of SLI, a distinct
subgroup, or part of the autistic continuum? In Bishop, D.V.M. and Leonard, L., editors,
Speech and language impairments in children: causes, characteristics, intervention and outcome. Hove: Psychology Press.
Bishop, D. V. M., & Baird, G. (2001). Parent and teacher report of pragmatic aspects of
communication: Use of the Children's Communication Checklist in a clinical setting. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 43, 809-818.
Bishop, D. V. M., & Norbury, C. F. (2002). Exploring the borderlands of autistic disorder and specific language impairment: A study using standardized diagnostic
instruments. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 917-929.
Boucher, J. (1998). SPD as a distinct diagnostic entity: logical considerations and directions for future research. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 33, 71-81.
Bowler, D. M., & Lister Brook, S. (1998). SPD and autistic spectrum disorder. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 33, 91-94.
Brook, S. L., & Bowler, D. M. (1992). 'Autism by Another Name? Semantic and Pragmatic Impirments in Children'. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 22(1), 61-81.
Conti-Ramsden, G., Crutchley, A., & Botting, N. (1997). The extent to which psychometric tests differentiate subgroups of children with SLI. Journal of Speech Hearing and Language Research, 40, 765-777.
Leinonen, E., & Letts, C. (1997). Referential communication tasks: Performance by
normal and pragmatically impaired children. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 32, 53-65.
Rapin, I., & Allen, D. (1983). Developmental language disorders: Nosologic
considerations. In U. Kirk (Ed.), Neuropsychology of language, reading, and
spelling (pp. 155-184). New York: Academic Press.
Sahlen, B., & Nettlebladt, U. (1993). 'Context and Comprehension: A Neurolinguistic and
Interactional Approach to the Understanding of Semantic-Pragmatic Disorder'. European
Journal of Disorders of Communication, 28(2), 117-140.
Shields, J., Varley, R., Broks, P., & Simpson, A. (1996). 'Hemispheric Function in
Developmental Language Disorders and High-Level Autism'. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 38, 473-486.
Shipley, K. G., & McAlfee, J. G. (1998).Assessment in Speech-Language Pathology:
A resource manual (2nd ed.). San Diego,London: Singular Publishing Group Inc.