View All Issues
Recruitment - a fact or an artifact? | Journal of All India Institute of Speech and Hearing

ISSN


ISSN

Vol 1 No 1 (1970): .
Article

Recruitment - a fact or an artifact?

Published June 8, 1970
How to Cite
RK, J. (1970). Recruitment - a fact or an artifact?. Journal of All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, 1(1), 50-53. Retrieved from http://203.129.241.91/jaiish/index.php/aiish/article/view/90

Abstract

The concept of loudness recruitment widely accepted as an abnormal auditory phenomenon  does  not  appear  to  be justified.    Experimental  results  provided by Stevens and Davis (1938) adequately show that the phenomenon of recruitment is not abnormal.  The data shown in the loudness function  curve (Stevens  and Davis, 1938, p. 118) reveals that the loudness level of 1000 Hz. tone at 40, 70, and 100 dB. SPLs is approximately 1, 10 and 100 sones respectively for normal subjects.   Therefore, if an individual has a sensorineural loss of about 40 dB SPL (equal to one sone), there will be loudness loss of I sone throughout the intensity range.   That is, he will perceive a tone of 70 dB SPL at a loudness level of 9 sones and a tone of 100 dB SPL at a level of 99 sones. Thus the difference in the loudness perceived by the normal and the abnormal ears is very small.

References

Blegvad, B. (1969) Differential intensity sensitivity and clinical masking. Acta Otolaryngol.,67, 428-434.
Davis, H. (1960) Audiometry. In Davis, H. and Silverman, S. R. (Eds.), Hearing and Deafness. Rev. Edn. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Dix, M. R. (1968) Loudness recruitment and its measurement with especial reference to theLoudness Discomfort Level Test and its value in diagnosis. Ann. Otol. Rhin. and Laryng.,
77, 1131-1151.
Herbert, F., Young, I. M., and Weiss, B. G. (1969) Clinical application of intensity difference
limen. Acta Otolaryngol., 67, 435-443.
Jerger, J. and Harford, E. (1960) Alternate and simultaneous binaural balancing of pure tone.
F. Speech Hearing. Res. 3, 15-30.
Luscher, E. (1955) Acta Otolaryngol. 45, 402. Quoted from Blegvad (1969). Newby, H. A. (1965) Audiology. 2nd Edn. London: Vision Press Ltd.
O'Neill, J. J. and Oyer, H. J. (1966) Applied Audiometry. New York: Dodd, Mead & Company, Inc.
Owens, E. (1964) Tone decay in Vlllt h nerve and cochlear lesions. J. Speech Hearing Dis.
29, 14-22.
Reger, S. (1965) Pure tone Audiometry. In Glorig, A. (Ed.). Audiometry: Principles and
Practices. Baltimore: The Williams and Wilkins Company.
Riesz, R. R. (1928) Differential intensity sensitivity for pure tones. Phys. Rev., 31, 867-875.
Quoted from Stevens and Davis (1938).
Stevens, S. S., and Davis, H. (1938) Hearing: Its Psychology and Physiology. New York:
Wiley.
Swisher, L. P., Stephens, M. M., and Doehring, D. G. (1966) The effect of hearing level and
normal variability on sensitivity to intensity change. F. Aud. Res., 6, 249. Quoted from
Blegvad (1969).
Yantis, P., and Decker, R. (1964) On the short increment sensitivity index (SISI test).
F. Speech Hearing Dis., 29, 231-246.
Young, I. M., and Herbert, F. (1967) Significance of the SISI test. F. Aud. Res., 7, 303-311