How to Cite
Devaraj, A. (1). Effect of Word Familiarity on Speech Discrimination Scores. Journal of All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, 14(1), 147-152. Retrieved from http://203.129.241.91/jaiish/index.php/aiish/article/view/844
Abstract
One of the basic requirements of any organism is the need to communicate. Speech has been the most commonly used mode of communication among human beings
References
BAGLI (1972) "Some acoustical and perceptual measurements of vowels spoken by American, British and Indian speakers of English" Unpubl. MA Thesis (as quoted from Gal and Keith 1978).
BLACK, J. W., "Accompaniments of word intelligibility", J. Speech Meas, Dis ., Vol. 17, pp. 409-418 (1952).
HIRSH.J.J., "Development of materials for speech audiometry" J. Speech
Hear. Dis. Vol. 15, pp. 321-337 (1952).
MALINI, M. S , "Standardization of Nu Auditory Test No. 6, on an English speaking Indian population" Unpubl. Masters Dissertation, Univ. of Mysore (1981).
Owens, E. "Intelligibility of words varying in familiarity" J. Speech Hear.
Res. Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 113-129 (1961).
RINTELMANN, W. F., Schumaier, D. R., and Jetly A. J., "List equivalency and reliability for normal listeners on Nu Auditory test No. 6 compari- son with data from original talker, in Rintelmann W. F., and associ- ates : Six experiments on discrimination utilising CNC monosyllables (North-Western University Auditory Test No. 6) J. Aud. Res. Suppl. 2 (1974).
ROSENZWEIG, M. R., and Postman, L "Intelligibility as a function of Fre- quency of usage" J. Exp. Psychol. Vol. 54 (6) pp. 412-422 (1957) In speech intelligibility and speaker recognition" Ed. Hawley M. E., Pub. Dawden, Hutchingson and Ross, Inc. stroudsburg, Pennsylvania (1973).
SCHEWARTZ et al., "Variables influencing performance on speech sound discrimination tests" J Speech Hear. Res. Vol. 17, pp. 25-32 (1974).
TILLMAN, T. W., and Sarhart, R., "An expanded test for speech discrimi- nation utilising CNC monosyllabic words (North-Western University Auditory test No. 6 )" Technical report, SAM-TR-66-55, USA school of Aerospace Medicine, Aerospace Medical Division (AFSC) Brooks Air Force Base, Texas (1966).
BLACK, J. W., "Accompaniments of word intelligibility", J. Speech Meas, Dis ., Vol. 17, pp. 409-418 (1952).
HIRSH.J.J., "Development of materials for speech audiometry" J. Speech
Hear. Dis. Vol. 15, pp. 321-337 (1952).
MALINI, M. S , "Standardization of Nu Auditory Test No. 6, on an English speaking Indian population" Unpubl. Masters Dissertation, Univ. of Mysore (1981).
Owens, E. "Intelligibility of words varying in familiarity" J. Speech Hear.
Res. Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 113-129 (1961).
RINTELMANN, W. F., Schumaier, D. R., and Jetly A. J., "List equivalency and reliability for normal listeners on Nu Auditory test No. 6 compari- son with data from original talker, in Rintelmann W. F., and associ- ates : Six experiments on discrimination utilising CNC monosyllables (North-Western University Auditory Test No. 6) J. Aud. Res. Suppl. 2 (1974).
ROSENZWEIG, M. R., and Postman, L "Intelligibility as a function of Fre- quency of usage" J. Exp. Psychol. Vol. 54 (6) pp. 412-422 (1957) In speech intelligibility and speaker recognition" Ed. Hawley M. E., Pub. Dawden, Hutchingson and Ross, Inc. stroudsburg, Pennsylvania (1973).
SCHEWARTZ et al., "Variables influencing performance on speech sound discrimination tests" J Speech Hear. Res. Vol. 17, pp. 25-32 (1974).
TILLMAN, T. W., and Sarhart, R., "An expanded test for speech discrimi- nation utilising CNC monosyllabic words (North-Western University Auditory test No. 6 )" Technical report, SAM-TR-66-55, USA school of Aerospace Medicine, Aerospace Medical Division (AFSC) Brooks Air Force Base, Texas (1966).