Abstract
The aim of the study was to understand the vocal quality of voice and eect of speech tasks on Smoothened Cepstral peak prominence (Smoothened CPP) across singers. Three groups of participants com- prising of 16 choral singers, 13 trained singers and 16 non singers were considered. Speech-Tool program developed by Hillenbrand (1994) was
used to analyze the Smoothened CPP. Mixed ANOVA was carried out to verify the statistical signicance of dierence across the groups and speech tasks. Both Choral singers and trained singers obtained higher smoothened cepstral peak prominence than non-singers. Within singers, trained singers obtained higher smoothened CPP values than Choral
singers; however the dierence was not statistically signicant. With respect to speech tasks, smoothened CPP was found to be higher for sustained phonation than Reading and this dierence was found to be statistically signicant. Hence, Smoothened CPP was able to dierentiate singers and non-singers irrespective of the speech tasks used.
References
type in adult females with functional dysphonia. Jour-
nal of voice, 19, 268-282.
Awan, S. N., Giovinco, A., & Owen, J. (2012). Eects of
vocal intensity and vowel type cepstral analysis of voice.
Journal of voice, 26(5), 670 e, 15-20.
Balasubramanium, R. S., Bhat, R. S., Fahim., S., & Raju,
R. (2011). Cepstral Analysis of Voice in Unilateral Ad-
ductor Vocal Fold Palsy. Journal of Voice, 25(3), 326-
329.
Brown, W. S., Hunt, E., & Williams, W. N. (1988). Phys-
iological dierences between the trained and untrained
speaking and singing voice. Journal of Voice, 2(2), 102-
110.
Carlson, G., & Sundberg, J. (1992). Formant frequency tun-
ing in singing. Journal of Voice, 6(3), 256-260.
Fant, C. G. M. (1970). Acoustic Theory of Speech Produc-
tion. Mouton & Co., N. V, Printers and publishers,
The Hague, Netherland.
Heman-Ackah, Y., & Michael, D., & Goding, G. (2002).
Relationship between cepstral peak prominence and se-
lected parameters of dysphonia. Journal of Voice, 16,
20-27.
Hillenbrand, J., Cleveland, R. A., & Erickson, R. L. (1994).
Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality. Journal
of Speech language and Hearing Research, 37, 769-
778.
Jannetts, S., & Lowit, A. (2014). Cepstral Analysis of Hy-
pokinetic and Ataxic Voices: Correlations with Percep-
tual and Other Acoustic Measures. Journal of Voice,
28(6), 673-680.
Kirsh, E. R., Van Leer, E., Phero, H. J., Xie, C., & Khosla,
S. (2013). Factors associated with singer's perception of
choral singing well-being. Journal of voice, 27(6),786 e,
25-32.
Leonard, R. J., Ringel, R., Horii, Y., & Danilo, R. (1988).
Vocal shadowing in singers and non-singers. Journal of
Speech and Hearing Research, 31(1), 54-61.
Letowski, T., Zimak, L., & Lupinowa, C. H. (1988).Tim-
bre dierences of an individual voice in solo and choral
singing. Archtone Acoustics, 13, 55-65.
Lundy, D. S., Roy, S., Casiano, R. R., Xue, J. W., & Evans,
J. (2000). Acoustic analysis of the singing and Speak-
ing Voice in Singing Students. Journal of Voice, 14(4),
490-493.
Noll, A. M. (1964). Short-term spectrum and \cepstrum"
techniques for vocal pitch detection. Journal of the
Acoustical Society of America, 41, 293-309.
Prakup, B. (2011). Acoustic measure of the voices of older
singers and non-singers. Journal of voice, 20(3), 341-
350.
Rossing, T. D., Sundberg, J., & Ternstrom, S. (1986).
Acoustic comparison of voice use in solo and choir
singing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
76, 1975-1981.
Rossing, T.D., Sundberg, J., & Ternstrom, S. (1987). Acous-
tic comparison of soprano solo and choir singing. Jour-
nal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82, 830-
836.
Shipp, T, & Izdebski, K. (1975). Vocal frequency and verti-
cal larynx positioning by singers and non-singers. Jour-
nal of Acoustic Society America, 58, 1104-1106.
Stacy, R., Brittain, K & Kerr, S. (2002). " Singing for
health": an exploration of the issues, Health education,
102(4), 156-162.
Sundberg, J. (1973). The source spectrum in professional
singing. Folia Phoniatrica, 25, 71-90.
Sundberg, J. (1970). Formant structure and articulation
of spoken and sung vowels. Folia Phoniatrica, 22, 28-
48.
Sundberg, J. (1974). Articulatory interpretation of the
`singing formant'. Journal of the Acoustical Society of
America, 55, 838-844.
Sundberg, J. (1975). Formant technique in a professional
female singer. Acoustica, 32, 89-96.
Sundberg, J. (1977). Singing and timbre. In Music room
acoustics. Royal Swedish Academy of Music, 17, 57-
81.
Sundberg, J. (1979). Formants and fundamental frequency
control in singing-an experimental study of coupling
between vocal tract and voice source. Progress and
Status Report- Speech Transmission Laboratory, 1, 65-
78.
Sundberg, J., & Bauer-Huppmann, J. (2007). When does
a sung tone start?. Journal of Voice, 21(3), 285-
293.
Sundberg, J. (1979). Perception of singing. Progress and
Status Report- Speech Transmission Laboratory, 1, 1-
48.
Ternstrom, S. (1991). Physical and acoustic factors that in-
teract with the singers to produce choral sound. Journal
of voice, 5(2), 128-143.
Troup, G. (1981). The physics of the singing voice. Physics
Reports, 74, 379-401.
Vijaitha, V. S., & Gopikishore, P. (2014). Vocal stability
in trained carnatic singers and non singers, Proceedings
of frontiers of research in speech and music (FRSM),
AIISH, Mysore.
Wang, S. (1983). Singing voice: bright timbre, singer's
formants and larynx positions. Proceedings of Stock-
holm Music Acoustics Conference, Stockholm, 1, 313-
322.
Watts, C. R., & Awan, S. N. (2011). Use of spectral/cepstral
analysis for dierentiating normal from hypofuntional
voices in sustained vowel and continuous speech con-
text. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research,
54(6), 1525-1537.
Zarate, J. M., & Zatorre, R. J. (2008). Experience depen-
dent neural substrates involved in vocal pitch regulation
during singing. Neuroimage, 40(4), 1871-1887.