Abstract
Researchers have reported the influence of various factors affecting phonological awareness in children, but there appears to be limited literature reporting the influence of socio economic status on the phonological awareness in Indian context. Hence the present study was planned to see the difference in performance between children from lower and middle socio economic status for phonological awareness tasks. A total of 20 native Kannada speaking children within the age range of 6 to 14 years were selected for the study and were divided into 2 groups, Group 1 consisted of 10 normal children with lower socio economic status & Group 2 consisted of 10 normal children with middle socio economic status. 'Test of Learning Disability' in Kannada which had 7 subtests to assess phonological awareness was used. The responses were collected from each child and statistically analysed.
Results revealed high scores for middle socio economic status children and the lower scores were obtained by lower socio economic grade children. There was significant difference in terms of performance in all tasks except, syllable oddity (final) task. Hence, it was evident from the result that, children from low socio economic status background performed below than the children from middle socio economic status. Therefore from the present study it can be concluded that socio economic status is evident for development of phonological awareness and clinician has to concentrate also on certain factors as poorer home literacy, including limited access to reading materials or modelling of reading by adults in the home, during the assessment of phonological awareness.
References
Aggarwal, O.P., Bhasin, S.K., Sharma, A.K., Chhabra, P., Aggarwal, K., & Rajoura, O.P., (2005). A new instrument (scale for measuring the socio economic status of a family: preliminary study. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 30, 4, 111-114.
Bird, J., Bishop, D., &Freeman, N. (1995). Phonological awareness and literacy development in children with expressive phonological impairments. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 446-462.
Bowey, J. (1995). Socioeconomic status differences in preschool phonological awareness and firstgrade reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 476-487.
Catts, H.W. (1999). Phonological awareness: Putting research into practice. Language Learning and Education, 1, 17-19.
De Cara, B., & Goswami, U. (2002). Similarity relations among spoken words: The special status of rimes in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 34,416-423.
Deepthi, M. (2009). Test for Learning Disability in Kannada. Unpublished dissertation, University of Mysore. Mysore.
Dodd, B. & Gillon, G. (2001). Exploring the relationship between phonological awareness, speech impairment and literacy. Advances in speech and language pathology, 3, 139-147.
Duncan, L., & Seymour, P. (2000). Socio-economic differences in foundation level literacy. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 14566.
Francis D. J. & Anthony J. L. (1999). “Development of Phonological Awareness”. Current directions in psychological science. American psychological society, 14, 5, 255-259.
Huffman, L. C., Mehlinger, S.L. & Kerivan, A. S. (2000). Risk factors for academic and behavioural problems at the beginning of the school. Chapel Hill, NC: The child mental health foundations and agency network.
Gillet, J.W., (2004). Understanding reading problems: assessment and instruction, 6th edition. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
Kaminski, R., & Good, R. (1996). Toward a technology for assessing basic early literacy skills. School Psychology Review, 25 (2), 215-227.
Lewis, B.A (1996). The co morbidity of phonology and reading disorders. Paper presented at American Speech and Hearing Association, Atlanta, GA.
Locke, A., Ginsborg, J., & Peers, I. (2002). Development and disadvantage: implications for the early years and beyond. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 37, 315.
McIntosh, B., & Liddy, M. (1999). The quick test of preschool language. Education Queensland. Cited in Beth McIntosh, Sharon Crosbie, Alison Holm, Barbara Dodd and Sian Thomas Enhancing the phonological awareness and language skills of socially disadvantaged preschoolers: An interdisciplinary programme Child Language Teaching and Therapy 2007; 23; 267.
Metsala, J., & Walley, A. (1998). Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexicalrepresentations: Precursors of phonemic awareness and early reading ability. In J. L.
Metsala & L. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning reading. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (1998). Semantic processing and the development of wordrecognition skills: Evidence from children with reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 85-101.
Raz, I., & Bryant, P. (1990). Social background, phonological awareness and children's reading. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8,209-225.
Shapely, B. (2001). “Reading first: NIE: phonemic awareness, text comprehension, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, reading”. (A news paper of education teaching supplement for reading first/ no child left behind).
Torgesen, J.K. & Bryant B.R. (1994). Phonological Awareness Training for Reading. Austin, TX: Pro Ed.
Torgesen, J. K., & Davis, C. (1996). Individual difference variables that predict response to training in phonological awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,63, 1-21.
Torgesen, J. K. (1999). Assessment and instruction for phonemic awareness and word recognition skills. In Catts, H. W. & Kamhi, A. G. (Eds.), Language and reading disabilities,128-153.
Tunmer, W. E., & Rohl, M. (1991). 'Phonological awareness and reading acquisition,' in Diane J.
Sawyer & Barbara J. Fox (eds.), Phonological awareness in reading: The evolution of current perspectives, Springer-Verlag, New York,1-30.
U.S. Department of Education. (1997). Nineteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC.
Vellutino, F.R., and Scanlon, D. (1987). Phonological coding and phonological awareness and reading ability: Evidence from a longitudinal and experimental study. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 33(3), 321-363.
Wagner, R., Torgesen, J., & Rashotte, C. (1994). Development of reading related phonological processing abilities: New evidence from bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73-87.
Walker, D., Greenwood, C., Hart, B., & Carta, J. (1994). Prediction of school outcomes based on early language production and socioeconomic factors. Child Development, 65 (2 Spec No),606-21.
Yopp, H. (1988). The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 160-177.
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. C. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 329.