Vol 7 No 1 (1976)
Article
How to Cite
Mayadevi. (1). Development and standardization of a common speech discrimination test for Indians. Journal of All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, 7(1), 46-52. Retrieved from http://203.129.241.91/jaiish/index.php/aiish/article/view/478
Abstract
Speech audiometry has been an important tool in the diagnostic test battery, as it provides a measure of the listener's response to speech. Discrimination testing clinically aids in the differential diagnosis of conductive, cochlear and retrocochlear pathologies.
References
1. Abrol, B. M. (1971) "Establishment of a pilot rehabilitation unit in Audiology and
Speech Pathology in India" Final report New Delhi. AIIMS-
2. Carhart, R. (1967) "Factors affecting discrimination for monosyllable words in background
noise"—paper presented in the Chicago Convention of the Speech and
Hearing Association.
3. Davis H. and Silverman (1970) Hearing and Deafness, Holt-Rinehart and Winston Co.,
USA.
4. De, N. S. (1973) "Hindi PB list for speech audiometry and discrimination test". Indian
Journal of Otolaryngology. 25. pp. 64-75.
5. Egan, P. James (1948). Articulation testing methods. Laryngoscope. 58. pp. 955-991.
6. Garret (1971) Statistics in Psychology and Education. Vakils. Ferrer & Simmons Private
Ltd., Bombay.
7. Hirsh et al (1952) "Development of materials for speech audiometry.'' J Speech and
Hearing Dis., 17, pp. 321-337.
8. Jerger,J (1968) "A new approach to speech audiometry" J. Speech and Hearing Res.
. 11. pp. 31,8-328.
9. Jerger, J. and Susan, J. (1971). Diagnostic significance of PB word functions. Archives
of Otolaryngology 93, pp. 573-579.
10. Kapur Y. P. (1971) "The development cf Hearing and Speech Test Materials based on
Indian Languages". A report.
11. Nagaraja, M. N. (1973) "Development oi a synthetic speech identification test in
Kannada language". Dissertation submitted to Mysore University.
12. Siegel, S. (1956) Non-parametric statistics., McGraw Hill Book Company Inc. New
York, London.
13. Swarnalatha (1972) "The development and standardization of Speech test material in
English for Indians"—Dissertation submitted to Mysore University.
Speech Pathology in India" Final report New Delhi. AIIMS-
2. Carhart, R. (1967) "Factors affecting discrimination for monosyllable words in background
noise"—paper presented in the Chicago Convention of the Speech and
Hearing Association.
3. Davis H. and Silverman (1970) Hearing and Deafness, Holt-Rinehart and Winston Co.,
USA.
4. De, N. S. (1973) "Hindi PB list for speech audiometry and discrimination test". Indian
Journal of Otolaryngology. 25. pp. 64-75.
5. Egan, P. James (1948). Articulation testing methods. Laryngoscope. 58. pp. 955-991.
6. Garret (1971) Statistics in Psychology and Education. Vakils. Ferrer & Simmons Private
Ltd., Bombay.
7. Hirsh et al (1952) "Development of materials for speech audiometry.'' J Speech and
Hearing Dis., 17, pp. 321-337.
8. Jerger,J (1968) "A new approach to speech audiometry" J. Speech and Hearing Res.
. 11. pp. 31,8-328.
9. Jerger, J. and Susan, J. (1971). Diagnostic significance of PB word functions. Archives
of Otolaryngology 93, pp. 573-579.
10. Kapur Y. P. (1971) "The development cf Hearing and Speech Test Materials based on
Indian Languages". A report.
11. Nagaraja, M. N. (1973) "Development oi a synthetic speech identification test in
Kannada language". Dissertation submitted to Mysore University.
12. Siegel, S. (1956) Non-parametric statistics., McGraw Hill Book Company Inc. New
York, London.
13. Swarnalatha (1972) "The development and standardization of Speech test material in
English for Indians"—Dissertation submitted to Mysore University.