Abstract
For optimal rehabilitation, it is essential to evaluate different factors which affect the intelligibility of alaryngeal speakers. Previous studies on Tracheo Esophageal (TE) speech production have mainly focused on aspects of neo-glottal phonation, speaking rate and pausing, and have ignored the changes in other speech characteristics. One such aspect which has not been studied extensively is the voiced/unvoiced distinction. Hence, the present study investigated the voicing contrasts in TE speakers. Two groups of subjects participated in the present study. Group I consisted of six TE speakers in the age range of 45 to 70 years. Group II consisted of six age and gender matched normal laryngeal speakers. Eight meaningful bisyllabic words containing all the voiced and unvoiced plosives (velar, palatal, dental and bilabial) in Kannada, uttered by the subjectswere recorded and analyzed perceptually and acoustically. The results of the perceptual analysis revealed that, voicing contrast in TE speakers were near normal except for /p/. Acoustic analyses showed significant differences between acoustic parameters of voiced and unvoiced plosives, endorsing the view that TE speakers make use of multiple acoustic parameters for voicing contrast. The results of the present study have clinical relevance as reduced voicing contrast in case of alaryngeal speakers may indirectly reflect on intelligibility of speech.
References
Dworkin, J.P, & Meleca R.J. (1997). Vocal Pathologies: Diagnoses, treatment and case studies. San Deigo, CA: Singular.
Gandour, J., Weinberg, B., Petty, S.H., & Dardarananda R. (1987) Voice onset time in Thai alaryngeal speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 288-294.
Hirose, H. (1996). Voicing distinction in esophageal speech. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl, 524, 56-63.
Hyman, M. (1955). An experimental study on artificial larynx and esophageal speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 20, 291-299.Lisker, L., & Abramson, A.S. (1964). A Cross language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20: 384-422.
Lisker, L., & Abramson, A.S.(1967). Some effect of context on voice onset time in English stops. Language and Speech, 10, 1-28.
Most, T., Tobin, Y., & Mimran, R.C. (2000). Acoustic and perceptual characteristics of esophageal and tracheoesophageal speech production. Journal of Communication Disorders, 33, 165-181.
Ng, M. L. & Wong, J. (2009). Voice onset time characteristics of Esophageal, Tracheoesophageal, and Laryngeal speech of Cantonese. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 52, 780-789.
Nicholas, A. (1976) Confusions in recognizing phonemes spoken by esophageal speakers: initial consonants and clusters. Journal of Communication Disorders, 9, 27-41.
Robbins, J., Christensen, J., & Kempster, G. (1986).Characteristics of speech production after tracheoesophageal puncture: voice onset time and vowel duration. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 29,499-504.
Sacco, P., Mann, M., & Schultz, M. (1968) Perceptual confusions in selected phonemes in esophageal speech. Journal of Indiana Speech and Hearing Association, 6, 196-203.
Saito, M., Kinishi, M., & Amatsu, M. (2000) Acoustic analyses clarify voiced-voiceless distinction in tracheoesophageal speech. Acta Otolaryngologica, 120, 771-777.
Savithri, S.R., Sridevi, M., & Santosh, M. (2003). Voicing Contrasts in Indian Languages: Acoustic measurements. A paper presented at the National Symposium of Acoustics, Pune.
Searl, J, & Carpenter, M.A. (2002).Acoustic cues to the voicing feature in tracheoesophageal speech. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 45, 282-294
Shames, G.H., Font, J.M., & Matthews, J. (1963) Factors related to speech proficiency in the laryngectomized. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 28, 273-278.
Singer, M.I., & Blom, E.D. (1980) An endoscopic technique for restoration of voice after laryngectomy. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 89, 529-532.