View All Issues
Influence of Native Language on Nasalance Measurement | Journal of All India Institute of Speech and Hearing

ISSN


ISSN

Vol 28 No 1 (2009): .
Speech

Influence of Native Language on Nasalance Measurement

Keywords
  • Nasalance,
  • Zoo passage,
  • Nasometer,
  • linguistic influence
How to Cite
Leah Philip, Pushpavathi M., & Sangeetha Mahesh. (1). Influence of Native Language on Nasalance Measurement. Journal of All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, 28(1), 14-18. Retrieved from http://203.129.241.91/jaiish/index.php/aiish/article/view/363

Abstract

‘Nasalance’ is influenced by many parameters such as age, dialect, native language and gender. Measurement of nasalance is usually done for standard passages such as Zoo passage, Rainbow passage and standard oral and nasal speech stimuli. However, the normative data of native English speakers for the same cannot be considered, as native language influence may play a significant role. Hence, the present study aimed at investigating the influence of three native languages (Kannada, Malayalam and Hindi) on nasalance values for standard Zoo passage, and compared the same with established data. The mean nasalance values were obtained from thirty normal adult females (17-35 years) each, having native language as Kannada, Malayalam and Hindi, while they read the Zoo passage, using Nasometer II 6400. Results indicated higher nasalance scores in Hindi and Malayalam speakers. The mean nasalance score for native Kannada speakers was found to be significantly lower than that in other two languages. Comparison of the results with the standard norms provided for English speaking individuals revealed similar mean nasalance values for native Kannada speakers. However, nasalance scores of native Malayalam and Hindi speakers were found to be significantly higher. These differences can be explained based on the phonemic characteristics of these languages. These inherent features of the language are also reflected in reading English. The results indicate that mean nasometric values obtained for a specific linguistic group may not be valid with other language speakers, even though they speak the same language. Thus, the results highlight native language as a factor influencing nasalance of normal reading. It is essential that for establishing normative data for Nasometer, issues pertaining to native language and dialect need to be considered.

References

Anderson, R.T. (1996). Nasometric values for normal Spanish speaking females: A preliminary report. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal, 33, 333-336.

Fletcher, S.G. (1972). Contingencies for bio-electronic measurement of nasality. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 37, 329-346.

Fletcher, S.G., Adams, L.E. & Mc Cutcheon, M.J. (1989). Cleft palate speech assessment through oral-nasal acoustic measures. In:, K.R. Bzoch, ed. Communicative Disorders Related to Cleft Lip and Palate. Boston: Little, Brown, 246-257.

Leeper, H. A., Rochet, A. P., & MacKay, I. R. A. (1992). Characteritics of nasalance in Canadian speakers of English and French. Presented at the International Conference on Spoken language Processing (Abstract), Banff, Alberta, 49-52.

Litzaw, L.L., & Dalston, R.M. (1992). The effect of gender upon nasalance scores among normal adult speakers. Journal of CommunicationDisorders, 25 (2), 55-64.

Mahesh, S. M.,& Pushpavathi, M. (2008). Nasalence value for zoo passage: a preliminary report. Proceedings of the International Symposium”Frontiers of Research on Speech and Music, 115 – 119.

Ramakrishna, B. S., Nair, K. K., Chiplunkar, V. N., Atal, B. S., Ramachandra, V., & Subramanian, R. (1962). Some Statistics of Indian Languages. In Some Aspects of the Relative Efficiencies of Indian Languages. Catholic Press, Ranchi, India,12-17.

Seaver, E.J., Dalston, R.M., & Leeper, H.A. (1991). A study of nasometric values for normal nasal resonance. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 715-721.

Syamala Kumari. B (1972). Malayalam Phonetic Reader .CIIL Publications . Mysore . Sweeney, T., Sell, D., & O’Regan, M. (2004). Nasalance scores for normal speaking Irish children. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal, 41(2), 168-174.

Van Doorn, J., & Purcell, A. (1998). Nasalance level in speech of normal Australian children. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal, 35, 287-292.

Van Lierde, K. M., Wuyts, F. L., De Bodt, M., & Van Cauwenberge, P. (2001). Normative value for normal nasal resonance in the speech of young Flemish adults. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal, 38, 112-118.

Van Lierde, K. M., Wuyts, F. L., Bodt, M., & Cauwenberge, P. (2003). Age related pattern of nasal resonance in normal Flemish children and Young adults. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic Reconstructive Surgery, 37,344-350.

Whitehill, T. L. (2001). Nasalance score in Cantonese speaking women. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal, 38, 119-125.