- Communication function,
- Nonspeaking children,
- Cerebral palsy
Abstract
Verbal and nonverbal communication fulfills various communicative functions. Intention to communicate is an important communicative function, which further includes functions such as; (i) request for information; (ii) request for attention; (iii) request for object; (iv) information; (v) instruction (action); (vi) instruction (speech); (vii) confirmation (viii) denial. Typically developing children use intentional communication to have a preplanned effect on the mother; who is the most available communication partner for communication. It is clinically observed that in children with cerebral palsy (CP), the intentional communication between the child and the mother is often impaired. However, very few studies have addressed this issue in greater detail. The aim of this study is to describe the factors in intentional communication between the mother and nonspeaking child with cerebral palsy. Amongst the factors analyzed, instruction (action) and information were the most predominant functions observed in mother and child respectively. The other functions showed a hierarchical trend which is discussed in detail. The results revealed a communication asymmetry in the use of various communicative functions between mothers and their non speaking children with CP. Mothers were dominant communication partners while children were passive communicative partner as revealed from the frequency of occurrence of various communicative function.
References
Basil, C. (1992). Social interaction and learned helplessness in severely disabled children. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 188-199.
Bates, E., Benigni, L.,Bretherton, I.,Camaioni, L., Volterra, V. (1977). From gesture to the first word: On cognitive and social prerequisites. In M. Lewis & L. Rosenblum (Eds.), Interaction, conversation and the development of language (pp. 347-407). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Bates, E., Beningni, L.,Bretherton, I.,Camaioni, L., Volterra, V. (1979). The emergence of symbols: Cognition and Communication in Infancy. NewYork: Academic Press.
Bates, E., Camaioni, L., & Volterra, V. (1975). The acquisition of performatives prior to speech. Merrill- Palmer Quarterly, 21, 205–226.
Blackstone, S. (1991). Intervention with the partners of AAC consumers. Augmentative Communication News, 4(2), 1 – 6.
Blackstone, S. (1999). Clinical News: Communication Partners. Augmentative Communication News, 12(1), 1 – 3.
Bzoch, K. B., & League, R. (1971). Assessing language skills in infancy: A handbook for the
multidimensional analysis of emergent language. Gainsville, Fla: The tree of life Press.
Calculator, S., & Dollaghan, C. (1982). The use of communication boards in a residential setting: An evaluation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 281-287.
Calculator, S. & Luchko, C. (1983). Evaluating the effectiveness of a communication board training program. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 48, 185-191.
Carter, M., & Hook, J. (1998). Communication programming for students with high support needs: A model for deciding what to teach. Special Education Perspectives, 7, 42–55.
Coggins, T. & Carpenter, R. (1981). The communicative intention inventory: A systems for observing and coding children’s early intentional communication. Applied psycholinguistics, 2, 235-251.
Cress, C., Linke, M., Moskal, L., Benal, A., Anderson, V., & La Montagne, J. (2000). Play and parent interaction in young children with physical impairments. Paper presented at the conference of the American Speech- Language- Hearing Association, Washington, DC.
Colquhoun, A. (1982). Augmentative communication systems: The interaction process. Paper presented to the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Convention, Toronto.
Culp, P. (1982). Communication interactions-nonspeaking children using augmentative systems and their mothers. Paper presented to the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Convention,Toronto.
Dore, J. (1978). Conditions for the acquisition of speech acts. In I. Markova (Ed.), The Social Context of Language (pp. 87-111). NewYork: John Wiley & Sons.
Dunst, C. J., & Wortman Lowe, L. (1986). From reflex to symbol: Describing explaining and fostering communicative competence. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2, 11-18.
Fogel, A. (1993). Two principles of communication: co regulation and framing. In Nadel and L. Camaioni (Eds.). New perspectives in early communication development. London: Routledge.
Hagberg, B. (1989). Nosology and classification of cerebral palsy. Giornale Neuropsichiatrrica dell’Eta’ Evolutiva, 4 (suppl), 12-17.
Halliday, M. (1975) Learning how to mean. London: Edward Arnold.
Lacono, T., Carter, M., & Hook, J. (1998). Identification of intentional communication in students with severe and multiple disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14, 102-114.
Kraat, A. (1991). Methodological issues in the study of language development for children using AAC systems. In J. Brodin, & E. Bjorck-Akesson (Eds.), Methodological issues in research in augmentative and alternative communication: Proceedings from the First ISAAC Research Symposium in Augmentative and Alternative Communication (pp. 118–123). Stockholm: Swedish Handicap Institute.