View All Issues
Artifactual Responses in Auditory Steady State Responses Recorded Using Phase Coherence Method | Journal of All India Institute of Speech and Hearing

ISSN


ISSN

Vol 26 No 1 (2007): .
Hearing

Artifactual Responses in Auditory Steady State Responses Recorded Using Phase Coherence Method

Published June 26, 2007
Keywords
  • ASSR, Air conduction, Bone conduction, Phase Coherence, Artifacts
How to Cite
Vijay Kumar Narne, Arivudai Nambi P, & Vanaja C.S. (2007). Artifactual Responses in Auditory Steady State Responses Recorded Using Phase Coherence Method. Journal of All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, 26(1), 79-82. Retrieved from http://203.129.241.91/jaiish/index.php/aiish/article/view/165

Abstract

It has been reported that artifacts at high stimulus levels contaminated auditory steady state responses (ASSR) when weighted averaging method was used to detect the responses. A few commercially available instruments use phase coherence method to detect the presence of ASSR. Thecurrent study investigated the presence of artifactual responses in ASSR when a phase coherence method is used. ASSR was recorded in fifteen adult participants with profound hearing loss, who did not show any behavioural responses. The upper limits of stimulation for obtaining artifact free ASSR, using supra aural headphones, insert earphones and a bone vibrator were determined. Analysis of the results revealed that the upper limit of stimulation for obtaining artifcat free ASSR is 95 dBHL for supra aural headphones, 105 dBHL for insert ear-phones and 50 dBHL for a bone vibrator. Phase analysis of the artifacts suggested that artifacts were either due to non-auditory physiological responses and/or electromagnetic aliasing artefacts

References

Gorga, M.P., Neely, S.T., Hoover, B.M., Dierking, D.M., Beauchaine, K.L., & Manning, C. (2004). Determining the upper limits of stimulation auditory steady-state response measurements. Ear & Hearing, 25, 302- 307.

Nong, D.X., Ura, M., Owa, F., & Noda, Y. (2000). An acoustically evoked Short latency negative response in profound subjects. Acta Otolaryngologica, 128, 960-966.

Picton, T.W., John, M.S., Dimitrijevic, A., & Prucell, D., (2003). Human Auditory steady state responses. International Journal of audiology, 42, 177-219.

Picton, T.W., & John, M. S., (2004). Avoiding electromagnetic artifacts when recording auditory steady state responses. Journal of American Academy of Audiology, 15, 541-554.

John, M.S., & Picton, T.W. (2000). Human auditory steady state responses to amplitude modulated tones:Phase and Latency measurements. Hearing Research, 141, 57-79.
Small. S.A., & Stapells, D.R. (2004). Artifactual responses when recording auditory steady state responses.Ear and Hearing, 15, 611-625.

Swanepoel, D., Hugo, R., & Roode, R. (2004). Auditory steady state responses for children with severe to profound hearing loss. Archieves of Otolaryngology head and neck surgery, 130, 531 - 535.

Rance, G., Rickards, F.W., Cohen, L.T., Burton, M.J., & Clark, G.M. (1993). Steady state evoked potentials Advancements in Otorhinolaryngology, 48, 44-48.

Rance, G., Dowell, R.C., Rickards, F.W., Beer, D.E., & Clark, G.M. (1998). Steady state evoked potential and behavioral hearing thresholds in a group of children with absent click evoked auditory brainstem response. Ear & Hearing, 19, 48-61.