This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Abstract
As the functioning of the cochlea is understood at present, the basilar membrane
on the impact of sound waves registers distinctly recognisable movements. The
latters' final mechanical effect however is the shearing action of the hairs of cort
against the superjascent tectorial membrane (Davis, 1958; Zalin, 1961). Subsequent
to this, cytochemical (Vinnikov and Titova, 1963 and 1964) and electrical (Wever,
1966) changes take over. The mechanical reactions of the basilar membrane thus
form a crucial step in audition. It is also recognised that among the various
cochlear structures it is this membrane that possesses the necessary extent, physical
property and histology (Engstrora, 1955) to effectively intervene within the cochlear
fluids the passage of sound viz. the micropressure changes caused by it in the medium
and be responsible for handing it over further to the hair cells (Wever and Lawrence,
1954). However, the observable mechanical as well as electrical responses of the
membrane to the stimulus is known since long (Lawrence, 1966) to be considerably
broad while the actual auditory response is quite sharp. For instance, a great
discrepancy is noticeable in the resolution of pitch. Our descrimination of pitches
is fixer than what is indicated by the known responses of the membrane. For example,
a trained ear can discern a change of even 2-3 frequency range in an incoming sound
while the membrane's known responses are never so fine.
References
inner ear, Nature, 228. Nov. 14, 1970(678-679).
Bekesy, G. V., Experiments in hearing, New York, 1960.
Davis, H., Excitation of auditory receptors, Handbook of Physiology, Neurophysiology, Vol. I
(Ed. J. Field), Am. Physiological Society, Washington, D.C. 565-584, 1958
Engstrom, H. The structure of the basilar membrane. Oto-Rhinolaryngologica Belgica, 9:531
1955.
Fletcher, H., Speech and Hearing in Communication Nostrand, C. 1961.
Fry, D. B., Linguistic theory and experimental research, Transactions of the physiological society
1960.
Fromkin, V., Some phonetic specifications of linguistic units: and electro-myographic investigation,
Ucla working papers in Phonetics No. 3, 1965.
Krishnamurthy, K. H., Kinematics of speech-Mentogram and spirogram, Phonetica, 17-1:1-14,
1967.
Krishnamurthy, K. H., A suggested means to study the forces on the basilar membrane during
the audition of a speech sound. Proceedings of the VI! International Congress of Phonetic
Sciences, Montreal, Canada, 1971.
Lawrence, M., Comment on Myginda's pressure theory for stimulation of the Labyrinthine
epithelium. Arch. Otolaryng, 83:10-11, i966.
Leanderson, R., Ohman and S. Persson, Electromyographic studies of facial muscle coordination
during speech. Acta Otolaryng. Suppl., 224:307-310, 1966.
Spoendlin, H., The innervation of the organ of corti. J. Laryng. and Otol., 81:737, 1961.
Sweetman, R. H., P. Dallos, J. Acoust. Soc. Am , 45:58-71, 1969.
Vinnikov, J. A., and L K. Titova, Cytophysiology and cytochemistry of the organ of corti: a
cytochemical theory of hearing. International review of cytology, Vol. 14 (Ed G. H. Bourne
and H. F. Danielli), 1963.
Vinnikov,'J. A., and L. K. Titova, Organ of corti: its histophysiology and histochemistry. Tr.
from the Russian' Basil Haigh, 1964
Wever, E. G., Electrical potentials of the cochlea, Physio!. Rev, 46:102-127. 1966.
Wever, E. G., and H Lawrence, Physiological Coustics, Princeton University Press, pp. 400, 1954.
Whitefield, J. C, The auditory pathway, London, Edwin Arnold, 1967.
Zalin, A., On the function of the kinocilia and sterocilia with special reference to the phenomenon
of directional preponderance. J. Laryng. and Otol., 81:119-135. 1961
28