Published
June 27, 1971
How to Cite
MN, H. (1971). The effect of shock on stuttering. Journal of All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, 2(1), 104-110. Retrieved from http://203.129.241.91/jaiish/index.php/aiish/article/view/133
Abstract
The effect of aversive stimuli on stuttering has been an important area of investigation. This is largely due to the fact that such investigations are immediately relevant for developing more effective techniques for the modification of stuttering. Secondly, the effect of punishment on stuttering is of immense theoretical significance. Whether response contingent punishment will be able to suppress stuttering or will it result in an increase in the same behaviour is a factor of importance for a theoretical position on stuttering.
References
Brutten, E. J., and Shoemaker, D. J. (1966) The Modification of Stuttering. Englewood Cliffs:
Prentice Hall.
Flanagan, B. I., Goldiamond, I. and Azrin, N. (1958) Operant stuttering: The Control of stuttering
behaviour through response contingent consequences. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 1, 173-177.
Erick, J. V. (1951) An exploratory study of the effect of punishment (electric shock) upon stuttering
behaviour. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Iowa.
Hegde, M. N. (1970) Stuttering, neuroticism and extraversion: To be published.
Martin, R. R., Brookshire, R. and Siegel, G. M. (1964) The effects of response contingent punishment
On Various behaviours omitted during a 'moment of stuttering'. Unpublished Manuscript,
Univ. of Minnesota. Quoted by Brutten and Shoemaker (1966).
Martin, R. R., Siegel, G. M. (1966) The effects of response contingent shock on stuttering. f.
Speech Hearing Res., 9, 340-352.
Siegel, G. M., Martin, R. R. and Henrickson, E. H. (1963) Experimental control of stuttering
behaviour, Progress Report I: Control of non-fluency in normal speakers. Unpublished
manuscript, Univ. of Minnesota. Quoted by Brutten and Shoemaker (1966).
Siegel, G. M., Martin, R. R. and Henrickson, E. H. (1964) Experimental control of stuttering
behaviour, Progress Report II. Unpublished manuscript, Univ. of Minnesota. Quoted
by Brutten and Shoemaker (1966).
Siegel, G. M. and Martin, R. R. (1965) Experimental modification of disfluencey in normal speakers,
f. Speech Hearing Res., 8, 235-244.
Solomon, R. L. (1964) Punishment. Amer. Psychol. 19, 239-253.
Prentice Hall.
Flanagan, B. I., Goldiamond, I. and Azrin, N. (1958) Operant stuttering: The Control of stuttering
behaviour through response contingent consequences. J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 1, 173-177.
Erick, J. V. (1951) An exploratory study of the effect of punishment (electric shock) upon stuttering
behaviour. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Iowa.
Hegde, M. N. (1970) Stuttering, neuroticism and extraversion: To be published.
Martin, R. R., Brookshire, R. and Siegel, G. M. (1964) The effects of response contingent punishment
On Various behaviours omitted during a 'moment of stuttering'. Unpublished Manuscript,
Univ. of Minnesota. Quoted by Brutten and Shoemaker (1966).
Martin, R. R., Siegel, G. M. (1966) The effects of response contingent shock on stuttering. f.
Speech Hearing Res., 9, 340-352.
Siegel, G. M., Martin, R. R. and Henrickson, E. H. (1963) Experimental control of stuttering
behaviour, Progress Report I: Control of non-fluency in normal speakers. Unpublished
manuscript, Univ. of Minnesota. Quoted by Brutten and Shoemaker (1966).
Siegel, G. M., Martin, R. R. and Henrickson, E. H. (1964) Experimental control of stuttering
behaviour, Progress Report II. Unpublished manuscript, Univ. of Minnesota. Quoted
by Brutten and Shoemaker (1966).
Siegel, G. M. and Martin, R. R. (1965) Experimental modification of disfluencey in normal speakers,
f. Speech Hearing Res., 8, 235-244.
Solomon, R. L. (1964) Punishment. Amer. Psychol. 19, 239-253.