Published
June 27, 1971
How to Cite
MN, V. M. (1971). The Uniqueness of rainville techniques. Journal of All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, 2(1), 64. Retrieved from http://203.129.241.91/jaiish/index.php/aiish/article/view/123
Abstract
Rainville techniques viz., Rainville (Rainville 1959) Modified Rainville or SAL (Jerger and Tillman 1960, Jerger 1965) and Modified Rainville (Lightfort, 1960) of determining BC thresholds have several merits over other methods of BC testing. Some of the merits reported by the advocates of these techniques are: (1) These techniques overcome the problem of localization in BC testing; (2); The problems like when to mask, which ear to mask and how much to mask do not arise; and (3) The prescribed ambient noise level for AC testing is also adequate
for BC testing as BC thresholds are determined while the ears are covered
References
Jerger, J. and Tillman, T. (1960) A New method for the clinical determination of sensorineural
Acuity Level (SAL) AMA Archieves of Otolaryngology: 71, 948-955.
Jerger, J. and Jerger, S., (1965) Critical Evaluation of SAL Audiometry, J. Speech Hearing Res.,
8, 103-127.
Lightfoot, C. (1960) The M.R test of Bone conduction Hearing. Laryngoscope 70, 1552-1559.
Rainville, M. J. (1959) New method of masking for the determination of bone conduction curves:
Translations of the Beltone Institute for Hearing Research, No. 11.
Acuity Level (SAL) AMA Archieves of Otolaryngology: 71, 948-955.
Jerger, J. and Jerger, S., (1965) Critical Evaluation of SAL Audiometry, J. Speech Hearing Res.,
8, 103-127.
Lightfoot, C. (1960) The M.R test of Bone conduction Hearing. Laryngoscope 70, 1552-1559.
Rainville, M. J. (1959) New method of masking for the determination of bone conduction curves:
Translations of the Beltone Institute for Hearing Research, No. 11.