Evidence for Stuttering Disfluencies to be Both the Result of Impaired Speech Production System and Coping Response to the Impairment
Abstract
The present study analyzed the topography of recurrent stutters (stutters on same words in repeated readings) in a group of 22 adolescents and adults who stutter to explore whether stutters are the direct result of impaired speech production system or coping responses to an underlying impairment. If stutters are the direct result of an impairment, there should be more concordant re-currences (stutter of a certain type on a word in one reading is followed by stutter of the same type if the word is stuttered in the next reading of the passage) than discordant recurrences. Signicantly greater number of discordant recurrences suggests that stutters may be coping responses to an underlying impairment. The present study found signicantly more concor- dant than discordant recurrences indicating at least some stutters are the direct result of impaired speech production system. Results of the study also
suggest that non-repetitive stutters (dysrhythmic phonations) may be coping responses.
References
Bloodstein, O. (2001). Incipient and developed stuttering as two distinct disorders: Resolving a dilemma. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 26 (1),67-73.
Bloodstein, O. (1997). Stuttering as an anticipatory struggle reaction. In R. F. Curlee & G.M. Siegel (Eds.), Nature and treatment of stuttering: New directions (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Bloodstein, O., & Bernstein Ratner, N. (2008). A handbook on stuttering. (6th ed.) San Diego, CA: Singular.
Bothe, A . K., Davidow, J. H., Bramlet, R. E., & Ingham, R. J. (2006). Stuttering treatment research 1970-2005: I. Systematic Review Incorporating Trial Quality Assessment of Behavioral, cognitive, and Related Approaches. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 321-341.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd Edition. Hillsdale:Lawrence Erlbaum.
Forster, D. C., & Webster, W. G. (2001). Speech motor control and interhemispheric relations in recovered and persistent stuttering. Develop mental neuropsychology, 19 (2), 125-145.
Howell, P. (2004). Assessment of some contemporary theories of stuttering that apply to spontaneous speech. Contemporary Issues in Communicative Sciences and Disorders, 39, 122-139.
Ingham, R. J., Grafton, S. T., Bothe, A. K., & Ingham, J. C. (2012). Brain activity in adults who stutter: similarities across speaking tasks and correlations with stuttering frequency and speaking rate. Brain and language, 122 (1), 11-24.
Johnson, W. (1959). The onset of stuttering: Research ndings and implications. Minneapolis,MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Johnson, M., & Knott, J. R. (1937). Studies in the psychology of stuttering: I. The distribution of moments of stuttering in successive readings of the same material. Journal of Speech Disorders, 2, 17-19.
Johnson, W., & Inness, M. (1939). Studies in the psychology of stuttering: XIII. A statistical analysis of the adaptation and consistency effects in relation to stuttering. Journal of Speech Disorders, 4, 79-86.
Johnson, W., & Knott, J. (1937) Studies in the psychology of stuttering: I. The distribution of moments of stuttering in successive readings of the same material. Journal of Speech Disorders, 2,17 - 19.
Karniol, R. (1995). Stuttering, language and cognition: A review and a model of stuttering as suprasegmental sentence plan alignment (SPA). Psychological Bulletin, 117, 104-124.
Kolk, H (1991). Is stuttering a symptom of adaptation or of impairment? In: H. Peters, W. Hulstijn, & C.W. Starkweather (Eds.). Speech motor control and stuttering (pp. 131 - 140). Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica.
Kolk, H. H. J., & Postma, A. (1997). Stuttering as a covert-repair phenomenon. In: R. Corlee & G. Siegel (Eds.), Nature and treatment of stuttering: New directions (pp. 182-203). Boston:Allyn & Bacon.
Meyers, S. C. (1986). Qualitative and quantitative diferences and patterns of variability in dis
uencies emitted by preschool stutterers and non- stutterers during dyadic conversations. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 11 (4), 293-306.
Neilson, M. D., & Neilson, P. D. (1987). Speech motor control and stuttering: A computational model of adaptive sensory-motor processing. Speech Communication, 6(4), 325-333.
Packman, A., & Attanasio, J. S. (2004). Theoretical issues in stuttering. New York: Psychology Press.
Packman, A., Onslow, M., & Menzies, R. (2000). Novel speech patterns and the treatment of stuttering. Disability and Rehabilitation, 22 (1-2), 65-79.
Perkins, W. H., Kent, R. D., & Curlee, R. F. (1991). A theory of neuropsycholinguistic function in stuttering. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 34 (4), 734-752.
Sander, E. K. (1961). Reliability of the Iowa Speech Dis
uency Test. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, Monograph Supplement, 7, 21-30.
Teeson, K., Packman, V., & Onslow, M. (2003). The Lidcombe behavioral language data of stuttering. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 46, 1009-1015.
Van Riper, C. (1982). The nature of stuttering (2nd ed.). Prospect Heights, Ill: Waveland Press.
Venkatagiri, H. S. (2005). Recent advances in the treatment of stuttering: a theoretical perspective. Journal of Communication Disorders, 35,375 - 393.
Wingate, M. E. (1964). A standard denition of stutering. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 10, 250-156.
Wingate, M. E. (1986). Adaptation, consistency and beyond: I. Limitations and contradictions. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 11, 1-36.
Yairi, E., & Ambrose, N. (1999). Early childhood stuttering: I. Persistency and recovery rates. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 1097-1112.
Yairi, E., & Lewis, B. (1984). Disuencies at the onset of stuttering. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 27 (1), 154-159.
Young, M. (1984). Identication of stutterers and stuttering. In D. Curlee & W. Perkins (Eds.), Nature and treatment of stuttering (pp. 13 -30). San Diego: College-Hill.