Skip navigation
Indian Literature Database on Communication Disorders

Indian Literature Database
on Communication Disorders

Smiley face


Home


Categories &
Resource Types


Author


Title


Year


Subject


Login/Register

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080//handle/123456789/885
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorThoppil, Minu George-
dc.contributor.authorSanthosh Kumar, C-
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Anand-
dc.contributor.authorAmose, John-
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-26T09:27:25Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-26T09:27:25Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.issn1998-3549-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/885-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Dysarthria refers to a group of disorders resulting from disturbances in muscular control over the speech mechanism due to damage of central or peripheral nervous system. There is wide subjective variability in assessment of dysarthria between different clinicians. In our study, we tried to identify a pattern among types of dysarthria by acoustic analysis and to prevent intersubject variability. Objectives: (1) Pattern recognition among types of dysarthria with software tool and to compare with normal subjects. (2) To assess the severity of dysarthria with software tool. Materials and Methods: Speech of seventy subjects were recorded, both normal subjects and the dysarthric patients who attended the outpatient department/admitted in AIMS. Speech waveforms were analyzed using Praat and MATHLAB toolkit. The pitch contour, formant variation, and speech duration of the extracted graphs were analyzed. Results: Study population included 25 normal subjects and 45 dysarthric patients. Dysarthric subjects included 24 patients with extrapyramidal dysarthria, 14 cases of spastic dysarthria, and 7 cases of ataxic dysarthria. Analysis of pitch of the study population showed a specific pattern in each type. F0 jitter was found in spastic dysarthria, pitch break with ataxic dysarthria, and pitch monotonicity with extrapyramidal dysarthria. By pattern recognition, we identified 19 cases in which one or more recognized patterns coexisted. There was a significant correlation between the severity of dysarthria and formant range. Conclusions: Specific patterns were identified for types of dysarthria so that this software tool will help clinicians to identify the types of dysarthria in a better way and could prevent intersubject variability. We also assessed the severity of dysarthria by formant range. Mixed dysarthria can be more common than clinically expected.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectDysarthriaen_US
dc.titleSpeech Signal Analysis and Pattern Recognition in Diagnosis of Dysarthriaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.journalname.journalnameAnnals of Indian Academy of Neurologyen_US
dc.volumeno.volumeno20en_US
dc.issueno.issueno4en_US
dc.pages.pages352.357en_US
Appears in Resource:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in Database are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.