Skip navigation
Indian Literature Database on Communication Disorders

Indian Literature Database
on Communication Disorders

Smiley face


Home


Categories &
Resource Types


Author


Title


Year


Subject


Login/Register

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080//handle/123456789/544
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKhosravi, Arezoo-
dc.contributor.authorAmirsalari, Susan-
dc.contributor.authorAjalloueyan, Mohammad-
dc.contributor.authorHonaramooz, Ayeh-
dc.contributor.authorTafreshi, Roya Issa-
dc.contributor.authorSaburi, Roya Issa-
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-20T11:23:36Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-20T11:23:36Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn2249-9520-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/544-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is a repolarization cardiac disorder that can lead to syncope, cardiac arrest and sudden death in apparently healthy individuals. The congenital type can be accompanied with congenital sensory-neural deafness (Jervell-Lang-Nielsen syndrome). Although there are limited studies assessed the frequency of LQTS in these children in developed countries, regarding introducing the new formula, it is necessary to re-evaluate the frequency of this syndrome. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional and descriptive study was done on 203 patients with congenital sensory-neural hearing loss (SNHL) that had cochlear implant surgery in Baqiyatallah cochlear implant center from 2008 to 2012. Corrected QT was calculated with this formula: QTC = QT + 1.75 (heart rate-60) Patients with QTC > 460 ms, were categorized in four groups: Long QT: QT > 460, Borderline: 440 < QTC ≤ 460, markedly long QT: QTC > 470 and very markedly: >500. Also, cardiac arrhythmias or arrest were evaluated in patients during cochlear implant surgery and in the postoperative recovery period. Result:Prevalence of LQTS in patients was 12.32% (25 patients). Prevalence of markedly long QT and very markedly long QT were 8.87% (18 patients) and 2.46% (5 patients) respectively. The prevalence of borderline group was 14.29% (29 patients). None of the patients during or after surgery were affected by cardiac arrhythmias or arrest. Conclusion: This study showed higher prevalence of LQTS in patients with SNHL than the normal population, and we suggest that all patients with congenital deafness should be screen for LQTS.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectSensory-neural hearing Lossen_US
dc.subjectJervell-Lang-Nielsen Syndromeen_US
dc.subjectLong QT syndromeen_US
dc.titleThe Frequency of Congenital Long QT Syndrome Based on New Formula in Children with Sensori-Neural Hearing Lossen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.journalname.journalnameIndian Journal of Otologyen_US
dc.volumeno.volumeno21en_US
dc.issueno.issueno2en_US
dc.pages.pages114-118en_US
Appears in Resource:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in Database are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.