Skip navigation
Indian Literature Database on Communication Disorders

Indian Literature Database
on Communication Disorders

Smiley face


Home


Categories &
Resource Types


Author


Title


Year


Subject


Login/Register

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080//handle/123456789/447
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKekade, Neha S-
dc.contributor.authorValame, Deepa Aniket-
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-17T11:39:44Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-17T11:39:44Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/447-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To study auditory temporal processing performance in 30 children with stuttering (CWS) and compare it with 30 age -matched controls. Materials and Methods: Auditory temporal processing was compared in two groups of children: With and without stuttering; in the age -range of 9 -14 years using Gap Detection Test (GDT) and Duration Pattern Test (DPT). Ear differences in the gap detection thresholds and duration pattern scores were also studied in both the groups. GDT was carried out using the GDT CD developed by Shivprakash and Manjula (2003) and DPT was carried out using the DPT CD developed by Gauri and Manjula (2003). Results: No significant difference was seen in the gap detection thresholds and DPT scores between the right ear and left ear scores in typical children and between the scores of the two ears in CWS. The performance of CWS group was significantly poorer as compared to that of typical children in both GDT and DPT. These auditory temporal processing deficits may interfere with the auditory feedback loop that is crucial to fluent speech production. Fluency inducing conditions like slow reading, DAF, or frequency -altered feedback reduce the dependence on auditory feedback thus inducing fluent speech. The results of the present study show that deficient auditory temporal processing in CWS may add to the demands placed on the feedback mechanism thereby increasing stuttering. Conclusions: As a group, CWS show evidence of compromise in their auditory temporal processing abilities. Tests of temporal processing should be included in assessment of IWS as a pre-therapy assessment tool along with assessment of stuttering.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectAuditory processingen_US
dc.subjectDuration pattern testen_US
dc.subjectRandom gap detection testen_US
dc.subjectStutteringen_US
dc.subjectTemporal resolutionen_US
dc.titleAuditory Temporal Processing In Children with Stutteringen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.journalname.journalnameJournal of Indian Speech Language & Hearing Associationen_US
dc.volumeno.volumeno28en_US
dc.issueno.issueno2en_US
Appears in Resource:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Auditory temporal processing in children with stuttering.pdf492.98 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in Database are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.