Skip navigation
Indian Literature Database on Communication Disorders

Indian Literature Database
on Communication Disorders

Smiley face


Home


Categories &
Resource Types


Author


Title


Year


Subject


Login/Register

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080//handle/123456789/2786
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGupta, Kartikesh-
dc.contributor.authorVarshney, Saurabh-
dc.contributor.authorTyagi, Amit Kumar-
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Amit-
dc.contributor.authorSood, Rachit-
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T09:40:45Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-28T09:40:45Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.issn2249-9520-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080//handle/123456789/2786-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Unaddressed hearing loss poses great loss with an annual risk of 750 billion United States dollars. In India, the incidence of adult-onset deafness is found to be around 7.6%. Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss (USNHL) has been found to affect 7.9%–13.3% of the Indian population. Since, most of the literature available is on bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SNHL), and limited work is done on USNHL. Hence, this study tends to list and analyze the clinical characteristics of patients with USNHL and is the largest Indian series related to clinical profile of USNHL. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology to study the clinico-epidemiological profile of 130 adult patients having USNHL. Patients were worked up using clinical, audiological, laboratory, and radiological tests, to reach a particular diagnosis. Results: The most common age group seen was 36–45 years (36.9%) with male preponderance. The majority of patients had an education of less than high school. About 27.7% of the patients had associated tinnitus and vertigo both. Most of the patients (30%) presented with 1–5-years duration of illness and noise as the most common associated risk factor. Forty-three percent of patients had profound hearing loss. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was done in 37% of patients and was found to be diagnostic in 6.1% of cases. The most common etiology found was idiopathic progressive SNHL (43.1%). Conclusion: USNHL was more commonly seen in nonelderly males. Majority had profound hearing loss and presented very late. This study also mentions the possible socioeconomic correlate of the patients with their clinical profile. MRI is useful in detecting rare etiologies such as dolichoectasia, multiple sclerosis, schwannoma, and vestibulocochlear anomalies. A very diverse etiology of USNHL was seen.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectAudiologyen_US
dc.subjectEpidemiologyen_US
dc.subjectSensorineural hearing lossen_US
dc.subjectSingle-sided deafnessen_US
dc.subjectUnilateral hearing lossen_US
dc.titleEpidemiological Study of Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Adultsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.journalname.journalnameIndian Journal of Otologyen_US
dc.volumeno.volumeno27en_US
dc.issueno.issueno2en_US
dc.pages.pages96-100en_US
Appears in Resource:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in Database are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.