Skip navigation
Indian Literature Database on Communication Disorders

Indian Literature Database
on Communication Disorders

Smiley face


Home


Categories &
Resource Types


Author


Title


Year


Subject


Login/Register

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080//handle/123456789/2739
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShamantha, M-
dc.contributor.authorManjula, P-
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-24T04:45:19Z-
dc.date.available2021-05-24T04:45:19Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.urihttp://203.129.241.91:8080//handle/123456789/2739-
dc.description.abstractIndividuals with sensorineural hearing loss with flat and sloping configuration, face major problems such as reduced audibility, reduced dynamic range, reduced frequency selectivity and impaired temporal resolution giving rise to poor speech perception and listening discomfort, in quiet as well as in adverse listening situations. Multichannel hearing aids with wide dynamic range compression made their way in order to resolve some of these issues. The Channel FreeTM hearing aids were developed claiming to improve speech intelligibility and listening comfort. To see the effect of channels on speech perception, a comparison of three-channel, five-channel and Channel FreeTM hearing aids, in ears with flat and sloping SNHL, was done by collecting data on SIS in quiet using phonemically balanced words from eleven participants having flat SNHL and high frequency words for ten participants having sloping SNHL group. In addition, data on SNR-50 and quality rating from eleven ears of participants with flat SNHL and ten ears of participants with sloping SNHL. The results revealed more benefit from Channel FreeTM hearing aid processing in flat and sloping SNHL groups compared to three-channel and five-channel hearing aids in the presence of noise (SNR-50) and parameters of quality was perceived better in all parameters of quality except for loudness with Channel FreeTM processing. The speech was perceived as softer with Channel FreeTM compared to three-channel and five-channel hearing aids. Non-parametric tests revealed more benefit from Channel FreeTM hearing aid processing in flat SNHL group of population compared to sloping SNHL group of population. Hence, the present study finds Channel FreeTM hearing aid processing as a better amplification method for individuals with flat and sloping configuration of sensorineural hearing loss, as it provides better speech perception in the presence of noise and better quality of speech.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectSpeech identificationen_US
dc.subjectSNR-50en_US
dc.titleComparison of Channel FreeTM and Multi Channel Hearing Aids on Performance in Individuals with Sensorineural Hearing Lossen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.journalname.journalnameStudent Research at AIISH-2016-17en_US
dc.volumeno.volumeno15en_US
dc.issueno.issuenoPart-Aen_US
dc.pages.pages181-195en_US
Appears in Resource:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Comparison of Channel Free and Multi Channel Hearing Aids on Performance in Individuals with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.pdf473.12 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in Database are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.