Skip navigation
Indian Literature Database on Communication Disorders

Indian Literature Database
on Communication Disorders

Smiley face


Home


Categories &
Resource Types


Author


Title


Year


Subject


Login/Register

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080//handle/123456789/251
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRamesh, A-
dc.contributor.authorJagdish, C-
dc.contributor.authorNagapoorinima, M-
dc.contributor.authorSuman Rao, P N-
dc.contributor.authorRamakrishnan, A G-
dc.contributor.authorThomas, G C-
dc.contributor.authorDominic, M-
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-13T07:21:32Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-13T07:21:32Z-
dc.date.issued2012-02-
dc.identifier.issn0971-5916-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/251-
dc.description.abstractBackground & objectives: There is a need to develop an affordable and reliable tool for hearing screening of neonates in resource constrained, medically underserved areas of developing nations. This study valuates a strategy of health worker based screening of neonates using a low cost mechanical calibrated noisemaker followed up with parental monitoring of age appropriate auditory milestones for detecting severe-profound hearing impairment in infants by 6 months of age. Methods: A trained health worker under the supervision of a qualified audiologist screened 425 neonates of whom 20 had confirmed severe-profound hearing impairment. Mechanical calibrated noisemakers of 50, 60, 70 and 80 dB (A) were used to elicit the behavioural responses. The parents of screened neonates were instructed to monitor the normal language and auditory milestones till 6 months of age. This strategy was validated against the reference standard consisting of a battery of tests - namely, auditory brain stem response (ABR), otoacoustic emissions (OAE) and behavioural assessment at 2 years of age. Bayesian prevalence weighted measures of screening were calculated. Results: The sensitivity and specificity was high with least false positive referrals for 70 and 80 dB (A) noisemakers. All the noisemakers had 100 per cent negative predictive value. 70 and 80 dB (A) noisemakers had high positive likelihood ratios of 19 and 34, respectively. The probability differences for pre- and post- test positive was 43 and 58 for 70 and 80 dB (A) noisemakers, respectively. Interpretation & conclusions: In a controlled setting, health workers with primary education can be trained to use a mechanical calibrated noisemaker made of locally available material to reliably screen for severe-profound hearing loss in neonates. The monitoring of auditory responses could be done by informed parents. Multi-centre field trials of this strategy need to be carried out to examine the feasibility of community health care workers using it in resource constrained settings of developing nations to implement an effective national neonatal hearing screening programme.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectAuditory responseen_US
dc.subjectNeonatal hearing screeningen_US
dc.subjectNoisemakersen_US
dc.titleLow Cost Calibrated Mechanical Noisemaker for Hearing Screening of Neonates in Resource Constrained Settingsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.journalname.journalnameIndian Journal of Medical Researchen_US
dc.volumeno.volumeno135en_US
dc.issueno.issueno2en_US
dc.pages.pages170-176en_US
Appears in Resource:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Low Cost Calibrated Mechanical Noisemaker for Hearing Screening of Neonates in Resource Constrained Settings.pdf584.29 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in Database are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.