Skip navigation
Indian Literature Database on Communication Disorders

Indian Literature Database
on Communication Disorders

Smiley face


Home


Categories &
Resource Types


Author


Title


Year


Subject


Login/Register

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080//handle/123456789/2055
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHegde, Medha-
dc.contributor.authorAchala, C-
dc.contributor.authorBhat, Sapna-
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-11T09:37:47Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-11T09:37:47Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.issn0973-662X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://203.129.241.91:8080//handle/123456789/2055-
dc.description.abstractVoice Handicap Index (VHI) is one of the measures of self perception of voice problem. It is a short self report questionnaire which is useful in routine clinical situations for assessing the progress of the disorder and the influence of interventions. Although various studies are done on self ratings by individuals with dysphonia (IWD) on VHI, there is a scarcity of studies on comparison of ratings by clinicians and self ratings by IWD. To compare the ratings between the VHI report of the IWD and that obtained by the clinician for the same patient. 13 IWD ranging in age from 18 to 57 years and 13 normal individuals matched on age and gender were chosen as the subjects. VHI was administered for both the groups and results were analyzed by the researcher. The SLP assessed the voice aspect in a separate assessment. VHI was also administered on the control group. Data was analyzed using Mann-Whitney ‘U’ test, Pearson’s correlation procedure and Wilecoxon Signed Ranks Test. The mean scores were higher in experimental group than those obtained by the control group in all the three sections of the VHI questionnaire. Mann Whitney U test showed high correlation between the scores obtained by the IWD and the clinician. There was no significant difference between the two groups on Wilecoxon Signed Ranks Test. Pearson’s correlation procedure showed that there is a high correlation between the VHI scores of the IWD and the scores of the clinician. These results suggest that clinicians are also reliable respondents in assessing the voice handicap in IWD. It may be concluded that the client’s perception of severity of voice disorder will enable the examiner to give treatment to IWD and to know the treatment efficacy by obtaining the clinician’s opinion on the VHI for individuals with voice disorders.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectVoice Handicap Indexen_US
dc.subjectDysphoniaen_US
dc.titleVoice Handicap Index – A Comparison of Clinician’s Ratings and Self Ratings by Individuals with Dysphoniaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.journalname.journalnameJournal of All India institute of Speech and Hearingen_US
dc.volumeno.volumeno28en_US
dc.pages.pages25-30en_US
Appears in Resource:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
25 - 30.pdf8.2 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in Database are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.