Skip navigation
Indian Literature Database on Communication Disorders

Indian Literature Database
on Communication Disorders

Smiley face


Home


Categories &
Resource Types


Author


Title


Year


Subject


Login/Register

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080//handle/123456789/1865
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Uday-
dc.contributor.authorMaggu, Akshay Raj-
dc.contributor.authorMamatha, N. M.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-15T11:36:20Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-15T11:36:20Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.issn0973-662X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://203.129.241.91:8080//handle/123456789/1865-
dc.description.abstractSeveral studies have reported poor temporal processing and speech-in-noise problems in children with learning disability (LD) (Chandrasekaran, Hornickel, Skoe, Nicol & Kraus, 2009; Hayes, Warrier, Nicol, Zecker & Kraus, 2003). Electrophysiological techniques such as speech ABR have been used (King, Warrier, Hayes & Kraus, 2002; Russo, Nicol, Zecker, Hayes & Kraus, 2005) to determine the auditory processing deficits in children with LD. The present study utilised BioMARK to find out the differences in speech sound processing in children with LD, in quiet and noise. Fifteen children in the age range of 8 to 12 years were selected for the study which included 5 children with LD and 10 typically developing children. All the 15 participants had a normal peripheral hearing sensitivity and they underwent BioMARK response testing with 40 ms /da/ stimulus. The stimulus was presented in quiet as well as in presence of white noise (+30 dB SNR) ipsilaterally. The peaks were marked as wave V, A, C, D, E, F, and O. The waveforms were converted into ASCII codes and processed using Brainstem Toolbox on Matlab vR2009B (Skoe & Kraus, 2010). Amplitudes of the formant of fundamental frequency, first formant and higher frequency were obtained and compared. Results showed a significant difference (p<0.05) in latency of the peaks V, A, D, E, F and O, of BioMARK in children with LD as compared to typically developing children. This was true for both quiet and noise conditions. Also, a significant difference (p<0.05) in the amplitudes of various formants was found in noise condition for children with LD and typically developing children. So, it can be concluded that there is a problem in decoding of information in presence of noise which is more pronounced in children with LD. Hence, other management strategies along with environmental modifications should be employed.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectNoiseen_US
dc.subjectLearning disabilityen_US
dc.titleEffect of Noise on Biomark in Individuals with Learning Disabilityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.journalname.journalnameJournal of All India Institute of Speech and Hearingen_US
dc.volumeno.volumeno31en_US
dc.pages.pages209-214en_US
Appears in Resource:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
209_pdfsam_jaiish31.pdf130.17 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in Database are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.